Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ted Weiland's avatar

THE REST OF STORY REGARDING PATRICK HENRY - if only Paul Harvey had made this known!

"...Convinced the Constitution would fail to secure and protect liberty, Patrick Henry [who refused to attend the Constitutional Convention as one of Virginia's delegates, declaring 'I smelt a rat!'] voiced his concerns to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788:

'…I say our privileges and rights are in danger. …the new form of Government … will … effectually … oppress and ruin the people…. In some parts of the plan before you, the great rights of freemen are endangered, in other parts, absolutely taken away…. There will be no checks, no real balances, in this Government: What can avail your specious imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain-rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances? …And yet who knows the dangers that this new system may produce: they are out of the sight of the common people: They cannot foresee latent consequences.... I see great jeopardy in this new Government.'67

"In contrast to the federalists’ failed predictions, this and nearly everything the anti-federalists forecast about the Constitution has come true [even after the Bill of Rights, aka a Bill of Goods,* were added]...."

For more, see Chapter 3 "The Preamble: We the People vs. Yahweh" of free online book "Bible Law vs, the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html

Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "BL vs. USC."

*Listen to Michael Gaddy's interview with me, entitled "Bill of Rights or Bill of Goods?," at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T1306

Second hour at T 1307.

Expand full comment
Lorraine Smith's avatar

A union is not a country, a union which is unelected, a union which is not Compliant with a Countries, " Fundamental Freedoms ," a union which works on a depopulation agenda, a union which bans production, a union which is not compliant with the Rule of Law, a union which does not work on Peace and Production in all countries, a union which uses net zero to enslave people, a union which is not Compliant with The Magna Carta 1215, The Doctrine Bill of Rights 1688/89 and 1776, The Nuremberg Code 1947 and the Geneva Protocol, which countries would want to be part of such a union, which has taken tax payers money, to wreak havoc on the tax payer ? Pray tell me, do countries comply with war , death and destruction or do countries cut the gordian knot and work on peace and production ? Oh yes, we must be prepared for war, but not to fight for a union, which has no country, which takes away our Fundamental Freedoms, which is in control of elections ?

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts