Preferential gov't programs favoring one group of skin colors over another are bound to breed jealousies which, when misappropriating blame, are bound to focus on the preferentially treated group. Human nature. A balanced individual, with time and upon reflection, will acknowledge the irrationality of that knee-jerk (and, probably, the irrationality of the gov't program) and begin introspection; an unbalanced individual will be inclined to lashing out.
As to abuse by one group upon an individual or other group, again look to human nature. I know a Vietnamese guy who, in his schools days, suffered abuse at the hands of a black classmate and his friends. To this day he harbors great hatred for that guy and, if not hatred, a great distrust of blacks in general. Human nature is not always rational. Only determined rationality will overcome human nature and emotional responses.
Know, too, that those who seek to control populations will use those irrational tendencies to divide public sentiments. They will use such distraction to pit the populace against itself to distract the governed from, with torches and pitchforks, coming after the authors of said division and the proper targets for that animosity.
Excellent response. So true in every respect. I find that with the interaction I had forced upon me by the government school system that even to this day I harbor a bit of hesitation when I am around a black person until the ice is broken and I feel less concerned about what he/she may have been thinking about me.
There is a sort of sixth sense when you get around someone who seems to have an attitude towards you because of your race. I was at a target range one day and a car load of Mexicans pulled up and I was the only one at the range at that time. The guy who got out of the car first glowered at me like I was somehow on his turf. I felt so uncomfortable that I packed up and left immediately. Especially since I had read where some guys had killed some one at a range and stole all of the weapons he had. Six on one isn't good odds and I may have been totally wrong, but I'd rather be wrong and alive than right and dead.
I tell folks all the time in conversation that as a white person I wouldn't get off the expressway at 79th street and 7th Avenue in Miami at 2:00 AM because I have a built in sense of self preservation and since that section of Miami is totally black and many white folks have been assaulted and beaten as well as killed in that neighborhood it doesn't make any sense to get off there. Is that "racist"? Or is it using common sense?
I could also talk about the interaction I had with shoplifters when I was a store detective in my early years. It seemed that stealing wasn't the issue and that wasn't considered the crime by the perpetrator. However, getting caught was. I also found out in high school during a race relations meeting, when black students had been rioting and harming white students, while listening to the questions and answers that many blacks, at least back then, in my school had a skewed morality. When asked if stealing a purse was wrong, the answer that came back was getting caught was what was wrong. Not the act of stealing the purse. The black students in that meeting seemed to think that it was "white man's law" and that violating the law wasn't the issue. Getting caught violating it was. I myself may have that kind of attitude towards a victimless crime law, but never have I considered getting caught being the issue for theft or other crimes where there is a victim. Sort of like speeding...is speeding really "wrong"? Heck no, since there is no victim. But getting caught can be a costly problem.
It's *all* orchestrated behind the scenes, then placed on the selected stage and broadcast via the media. Those "random killers" are MK-ULTRA trauma-based mind-controlled actors purposefully programmed to foment frustration, anger, and finger-pointing. The low-frequency energy and forthcoming actions (or inaction) further the wayward wizards' sicko death-cult enslavement agenda which is based on their creepy "transgender/transhuman" exotic-technology-worshiping religious zealotry.
Preferential gov't programs favoring one group of skin colors over another are bound to breed jealousies which, when misappropriating blame, are bound to focus on the preferentially treated group. Human nature. A balanced individual, with time and upon reflection, will acknowledge the irrationality of that knee-jerk (and, probably, the irrationality of the gov't program) and begin introspection; an unbalanced individual will be inclined to lashing out.
As to abuse by one group upon an individual or other group, again look to human nature. I know a Vietnamese guy who, in his schools days, suffered abuse at the hands of a black classmate and his friends. To this day he harbors great hatred for that guy and, if not hatred, a great distrust of blacks in general. Human nature is not always rational. Only determined rationality will overcome human nature and emotional responses.
Know, too, that those who seek to control populations will use those irrational tendencies to divide public sentiments. They will use such distraction to pit the populace against itself to distract the governed from, with torches and pitchforks, coming after the authors of said division and the proper targets for that animosity.
Excellent response. So true in every respect. I find that with the interaction I had forced upon me by the government school system that even to this day I harbor a bit of hesitation when I am around a black person until the ice is broken and I feel less concerned about what he/she may have been thinking about me.
There is a sort of sixth sense when you get around someone who seems to have an attitude towards you because of your race. I was at a target range one day and a car load of Mexicans pulled up and I was the only one at the range at that time. The guy who got out of the car first glowered at me like I was somehow on his turf. I felt so uncomfortable that I packed up and left immediately. Especially since I had read where some guys had killed some one at a range and stole all of the weapons he had. Six on one isn't good odds and I may have been totally wrong, but I'd rather be wrong and alive than right and dead.
I tell folks all the time in conversation that as a white person I wouldn't get off the expressway at 79th street and 7th Avenue in Miami at 2:00 AM because I have a built in sense of self preservation and since that section of Miami is totally black and many white folks have been assaulted and beaten as well as killed in that neighborhood it doesn't make any sense to get off there. Is that "racist"? Or is it using common sense?
I could also talk about the interaction I had with shoplifters when I was a store detective in my early years. It seemed that stealing wasn't the issue and that wasn't considered the crime by the perpetrator. However, getting caught was. I also found out in high school during a race relations meeting, when black students had been rioting and harming white students, while listening to the questions and answers that many blacks, at least back then, in my school had a skewed morality. When asked if stealing a purse was wrong, the answer that came back was getting caught was what was wrong. Not the act of stealing the purse. The black students in that meeting seemed to think that it was "white man's law" and that violating the law wasn't the issue. Getting caught violating it was. I myself may have that kind of attitude towards a victimless crime law, but never have I considered getting caught being the issue for theft or other crimes where there is a victim. Sort of like speeding...is speeding really "wrong"? Heck no, since there is no victim. But getting caught can be a costly problem.
It's *all* orchestrated behind the scenes, then placed on the selected stage and broadcast via the media. Those "random killers" are MK-ULTRA trauma-based mind-controlled actors purposefully programmed to foment frustration, anger, and finger-pointing. The low-frequency energy and forthcoming actions (or inaction) further the wayward wizards' sicko death-cult enslavement agenda which is based on their creepy "transgender/transhuman" exotic-technology-worshiping religious zealotry.
Stay alert, strong, and courageous, lion!
$5 MILLION DOLLAR MAN. A denizen of San Francisco demands reparations for slavery. Listen to Turfseer’s hit song. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/5-million-dollar-man
The article that you based this on is just plain SICK. These people have totally gone off the deep end.
What is "it"?