Well written. I loved all your points. It actually helped solidify my perspectives that had started to become lax that never should have.
One interesting analogy: you said, “Nevertheless, if the urban insane wish to be prey for predators, that's their privilege. But no one has the right to tell someone else that he or she cannot possess the tools necessary to defend his or her life and the lives of loved ones.” And I agree. And it also could say the same for medicine and vaccines:
… if the urban insane wish to be prey for big pharma injury by their drugs and vaccines, that's their privilege. Let them have their drugs and shots. But no one has the right to tell someone else that he or she must take it or suffer severe consequences of noncompliance, and that they cannot possess the alternative tools necessary to defend his or her health and life and the lives of loved ones, such as Ivermectin or HCQ.
Yet that’s exactly what they did. They took away our weapons against disease and only allotted us what they wanted us to use.
I know they aren’t “arms”, but the insanity is the same.
I live in Germany - a fascist Republic, a tyranny with escalation in violence executed by migrants against the German people. And guess what?! There is no allowance for carrying weapons. And the government can act with tyranny - cause they know, the police and the military is on their side...and the people don't have any guns.
I feel for you. It’s sick. You’re not even allowed to criticize the tribe without facing prison. And surely don’t get caught with a copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. See why we want to keep our guns? Because they are a deterrent. At least to a degree.
The illegal alienistas all over the world, including Germany, are post modern Black Shirt and Brown Shirt thugs, useful idiots for the End Stage Communist Global government. Guess what they've been imported to do......!
She should be equipped with a fully automatic mini-Uzi 9mm, just like my granddaughters would be if it wasn't unaffordable & illegal. Period, Full Stop.
We concur100 percent with this non pareil munificent article .There is a top down command and control learned helplessness in the post modern western hemisphere currently being invaded,stormed by Non Christian poor folk..some..many..are barbarians visible and risible in all American blue cities.If the Globohomosexual theofacistic Talmudic bolshevists are permitted to go any further with their onerous..odious..obvious agenda we will see armed conflict.asymetrical
warfare ion and in the American fatherland..the American homeland..it can be argued that it is no longer *American*at all..that the quintessential WeF Blackrock New Jew Order controligarch s must be battled out of any powers and influence by what we opt to call The New American Kristallnacht *We endorse non sectarian armed Christian resistance.We salute this author s stentorian magisterial incisive commentary.Some point to
oddly similar words from Eric Prince....blackwater.academi... Prep Network.Stay alert.Stay free.Stay organized .**Only a fool thinks...only freemasonic steroid cops military and government should have tactical fine weaponry.* Rearm all decent folk Now*. God Bless.
To “Arm None” is not a possibility. To illegally infringe upon a citizen right to own and bear arms by taxes, regulations, and “laws”, does not eliminate all arms. Instead it concentrates arms into the hands of a few.
Some of the few would be the common criminals who would acquire them through illegal means, who would then be able to terrorize the law abiding citizenry with impunity.
Another part of the few, would be government, military, local police. And if they could be trusted to be and to remain benevolent towards the citizenry, it might seem to be good alternative to full citizen’s Constitutional right for self protection. But our Constitutional right gives us the ability to respond instantly to a threat, whereas the government response may come too late.
Disarming the citizens makes them easy prey not only for the common criminals, but also for nefarious individuals or organizations within government to prey upon and lord over citizenry…err, at that point they are no longer citizens, but subjects.
Our Founders understood all this and our Constitution was a means of restraining government.
Marxists hate Individualism, they don't have full control over the sovereign individual who responds with his God given inalienable rights. Their intent then is herd mankind into Collectivism, where only the few will retain rights and ownerships.
Yes, I did enjoy your article and I restacked too. I hope many more Americans become aware of the intentions of the Marxists and their cronies and what they are trying to accomplish.
Well met. One thing I might point out. Try removing the word “state”, as in “free state” and replacing it with the word “condition.” Then it makes way more sense. I don’t think they were referring to “the” state, but to the condition of freedom. Makes way more sense that way, and if you read the articles leading up to it being number two, you’ll find that’s correct.
My reasoning leads me to believe that the masses should relinquish their weapons as soon as the military, paramilitary, guards, and security companies do as well. Keep it an even killing field so to speak. If I can't own an automatic killing machine, neither should the military, paramilitary, guards, or security companies either. You take our guns, you take our power - never gonna happen - without a battle anyway.
What is this abstraction nation but violence? The people are violent. The emotion rules the way they interact. Violence is explicit and implicit. We have no rights unless we are armed and enforce them. While military weapons are absurd and a State military force equally absurd to have them to defend themselves against the Federal state or neighboring states that citizens have the right to defend themselves by force is not.
The issue with both sides is arguing the wrong issue. The issue is the use of firearms by all. Police to Ghetto residents. The second issue is that the firearms availability may include military grade firearms-again Police to Ghetto residents. This nation is quite violent. Guns are not the cause of this problem but the symptom. If we seriously think about it if we were going to revisit the Civil War we would see B-52 or F-16 and Apache gunships. A “well armed militia” is patently absurd. In the end we would be better abolishing government control over our life. Instead we pretend that the government would have shall we say Justified Paternalism in regard to our rights to own an Abram’s tank when they build so many to use-maybe against us. Maybe we should have the state we reside in take over these Federal military forces and bases including atomics and nerve gas
" Maybe we should have the state we reside in take over these Federal military forces and bases including atomics and nerve gas" And then what. How about destroying never gas since it is outlawed in the Geneva Convention and destroy all atomics. Obviously, at least to me and most, a well armed militia has to do with what a person could carry or use personally. Like Switzerland since the mid 1300's. Today they have full auto at home and some have Stinger missiles in their garage. Want to invade Switzerland? Have fun. As for your opinion that both sides are arguing the wrong issue...your argument is making no logical sense to me. A nation can't be violent. Certain elements are. Understand that the right to self defense is an UNALIENABLE right by whatever means necessary. Why should government agents be allowed to have full auto and yet the population is denied them? What makes them superior outside of numbers of psychopaths in their ranks? The Bryan Malinowski situation that just took place is a good reason NOT to have the ATF running around violating our rights to keep and bear arms. Understand one thing. A crime has a victim. Owning a device isn't a crime. Using it for murder is not a crime. MURDER is the crime. How I were to murder someone is irrelevant. I could use a hammer, a knife, a pen, a baseball bat, a car...the list is endless. The CRIME should be what the end result is, not what it was done with. Try reading this post. https://www.courageouslion.us/p/those-forgotten-and-ignored-13-words It explains in detail my side of the argument. The other side holds not the least bit of logic.
The second amendment is part of the Bill of Rights attached to the constitution. It is a PROHIBITION on those that administer government. All of the first 10 in the bill of rights are rights that exist with or without being written on a piece of paper. They are called UNALIENABLE rights. One thing I know about you Adrian is that if we ever meet, I’m staying 20 feet away. LOL!
Well written. I loved all your points. It actually helped solidify my perspectives that had started to become lax that never should have.
One interesting analogy: you said, “Nevertheless, if the urban insane wish to be prey for predators, that's their privilege. But no one has the right to tell someone else that he or she cannot possess the tools necessary to defend his or her life and the lives of loved ones.” And I agree. And it also could say the same for medicine and vaccines:
… if the urban insane wish to be prey for big pharma injury by their drugs and vaccines, that's their privilege. Let them have their drugs and shots. But no one has the right to tell someone else that he or she must take it or suffer severe consequences of noncompliance, and that they cannot possess the alternative tools necessary to defend his or her health and life and the lives of loved ones, such as Ivermectin or HCQ.
Yet that’s exactly what they did. They took away our weapons against disease and only allotted us what they wanted us to use.
I know they aren’t “arms”, but the insanity is the same.
Your analogy is spot on.
I live in Germany - a fascist Republic, a tyranny with escalation in violence executed by migrants against the German people. And guess what?! There is no allowance for carrying weapons. And the government can act with tyranny - cause they know, the police and the military is on their side...and the people don't have any guns.
I feel for you. It’s sick. You’re not even allowed to criticize the tribe without facing prison. And surely don’t get caught with a copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. See why we want to keep our guns? Because they are a deterrent. At least to a degree.
The illegal alienistas all over the world, including Germany, are post modern Black Shirt and Brown Shirt thugs, useful idiots for the End Stage Communist Global government. Guess what they've been imported to do......!
Die?
Die? Not sure I understand your response in terms of my comment. I was asking a rhetorical question. Can you clarify? Thanks
It's easy...THEY WILL DIE if they start any shit for the end stage you mentioned.
Thank you very much for your clarification!
She should be equipped with a fully automatic mini-Uzi 9mm, just like my granddaughters would be if it wasn't unaffordable & illegal. Period, Full Stop.
We concur100 percent with this non pareil munificent article .There is a top down command and control learned helplessness in the post modern western hemisphere currently being invaded,stormed by Non Christian poor folk..some..many..are barbarians visible and risible in all American blue cities.If the Globohomosexual theofacistic Talmudic bolshevists are permitted to go any further with their onerous..odious..obvious agenda we will see armed conflict.asymetrical
warfare ion and in the American fatherland..the American homeland..it can be argued that it is no longer *American*at all..that the quintessential WeF Blackrock New Jew Order controligarch s must be battled out of any powers and influence by what we opt to call The New American Kristallnacht *We endorse non sectarian armed Christian resistance.We salute this author s stentorian magisterial incisive commentary.Some point to
oddly similar words from Eric Prince....blackwater.academi... Prep Network.Stay alert.Stay free.Stay organized .**Only a fool thinks...only freemasonic steroid cops military and government should have tactical fine weaponry.* Rearm all decent folk Now*. God Bless.
To “Arm None” is not a possibility. To illegally infringe upon a citizen right to own and bear arms by taxes, regulations, and “laws”, does not eliminate all arms. Instead it concentrates arms into the hands of a few.
Some of the few would be the common criminals who would acquire them through illegal means, who would then be able to terrorize the law abiding citizenry with impunity.
Another part of the few, would be government, military, local police. And if they could be trusted to be and to remain benevolent towards the citizenry, it might seem to be good alternative to full citizen’s Constitutional right for self protection. But our Constitutional right gives us the ability to respond instantly to a threat, whereas the government response may come too late.
Disarming the citizens makes them easy prey not only for the common criminals, but also for nefarious individuals or organizations within government to prey upon and lord over citizenry…err, at that point they are no longer citizens, but subjects.
Our Founders understood all this and our Constitution was a means of restraining government.
Marxists hate Individualism, they don't have full control over the sovereign individual who responds with his God given inalienable rights. Their intent then is herd mankind into Collectivism, where only the few will retain rights and ownerships.
You would like my post Those Forgotten and Ignored 13 Words https://www.courageouslion.us/p/those-forgotten-and-ignored-13-words
Yes, I did enjoy your article and I restacked too. I hope many more Americans become aware of the intentions of the Marxists and their cronies and what they are trying to accomplish.
Never surrender never quit can never have enough firearms and ammo
ALL
Definitely armed is better. I very seldom go anywhere without mine.
Where can I get one of those SUVs w/that nice attachment? 😂. That’s one hell of a deterrent !
The criminals lie in our institutions treasonous grifting scum
LIKE! The like button is still "disarmed".
Sometimes according to your connection there is a delay. That's what I've found out.
Well met. One thing I might point out. Try removing the word “state”, as in “free state” and replacing it with the word “condition.” Then it makes way more sense. I don’t think they were referring to “the” state, but to the condition of freedom. Makes way more sense that way, and if you read the articles leading up to it being number two, you’ll find that’s correct.
My reasoning leads me to believe that the masses should relinquish their weapons as soon as the military, paramilitary, guards, and security companies do as well. Keep it an even killing field so to speak. If I can't own an automatic killing machine, neither should the military, paramilitary, guards, or security companies either. You take our guns, you take our power - never gonna happen - without a battle anyway.
What is this abstraction nation but violence? The people are violent. The emotion rules the way they interact. Violence is explicit and implicit. We have no rights unless we are armed and enforce them. While military weapons are absurd and a State military force equally absurd to have them to defend themselves against the Federal state or neighboring states that citizens have the right to defend themselves by force is not.
The issue with both sides is arguing the wrong issue. The issue is the use of firearms by all. Police to Ghetto residents. The second issue is that the firearms availability may include military grade firearms-again Police to Ghetto residents. This nation is quite violent. Guns are not the cause of this problem but the symptom. If we seriously think about it if we were going to revisit the Civil War we would see B-52 or F-16 and Apache gunships. A “well armed militia” is patently absurd. In the end we would be better abolishing government control over our life. Instead we pretend that the government would have shall we say Justified Paternalism in regard to our rights to own an Abram’s tank when they build so many to use-maybe against us. Maybe we should have the state we reside in take over these Federal military forces and bases including atomics and nerve gas
" Maybe we should have the state we reside in take over these Federal military forces and bases including atomics and nerve gas" And then what. How about destroying never gas since it is outlawed in the Geneva Convention and destroy all atomics. Obviously, at least to me and most, a well armed militia has to do with what a person could carry or use personally. Like Switzerland since the mid 1300's. Today they have full auto at home and some have Stinger missiles in their garage. Want to invade Switzerland? Have fun. As for your opinion that both sides are arguing the wrong issue...your argument is making no logical sense to me. A nation can't be violent. Certain elements are. Understand that the right to self defense is an UNALIENABLE right by whatever means necessary. Why should government agents be allowed to have full auto and yet the population is denied them? What makes them superior outside of numbers of psychopaths in their ranks? The Bryan Malinowski situation that just took place is a good reason NOT to have the ATF running around violating our rights to keep and bear arms. Understand one thing. A crime has a victim. Owning a device isn't a crime. Using it for murder is not a crime. MURDER is the crime. How I were to murder someone is irrelevant. I could use a hammer, a knife, a pen, a baseball bat, a car...the list is endless. The CRIME should be what the end result is, not what it was done with. Try reading this post. https://www.courageouslion.us/p/those-forgotten-and-ignored-13-words It explains in detail my side of the argument. The other side holds not the least bit of logic.
The second amendment is part of the Bill of Rights attached to the constitution. It is a PROHIBITION on those that administer government. All of the first 10 in the bill of rights are rights that exist with or without being written on a piece of paper. They are called UNALIENABLE rights. One thing I know about you Adrian is that if we ever meet, I’m staying 20 feet away. LOL!
I like Courageous Lion's way of doing things more like my beliefs.
OLD WEST WAY!