“The Oath Keepers” are “seditious?????

BREAKING NEWS… 5/25/2023 Stuart Rhodes has been sentenced to 18 years in a cage for “seditious conspiracy”. The Oath Keepers state: “I Do Solemnly Swear That I Will Uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, Against All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic…Pledging My Life, My Fortune, and My Sacred Honor. So Help Me God.” Sure sounds like a bunch of seditious folks to me! That is IF the SYSTEM is against the Constitution. Is it??? Naaaaa…it’s all our imagination! ~C.L.

---

“The Oath Keepers” are “seditious?????

So let me get this straight...a bunch of military members, police officers, retired military and even firefighters are anti government and seditious that have taken an oath that reads like this:

“I Do Solemnly Swear That I Will Uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, Against All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic…Pledging My Life, My Fortune, and My Sacred Honor. So Help Me God.” 

For starters, what IS the government of the United States? A lot of people think that those people who work down at city hall or the Federal Building are the government. WRONG!! Way WRONG. The government of these united States is the United States Constitution and all laws made in PURSUANCE thereof. That means the “law” must FOLLOW the Constitution and that those who are ADMINISTERING the law must take an oath to uphold and defend that very Constitution. So we have the government laid out in the Constitution and those that administer it who are supposed to be the public servants who are sworn to uphold the government. So if someone swears to uphold it and stands by that oath are they anti government? Are they seditious for doing so? Or are those who persecute or prosecute someone like Stewart Rhodes seditious and anti government?

Are those who violate their oaths of office daily and make “laws” that are indirect contradiction to that very document the ones who are the lawless ones? Aren’t THEY the criminals? Did you ever read George Orwell’s 1984? In that book one of the “newspeak” terms he came up with was “doublethink”. Doublethink for all intents is actually a good way to look at the words “cognitive dissonance”. It is a way for the human mind to carry in it, two opposing thoughts and yet not see them as opposing thoughts. In context of this article it would be believing that someone who took an oath to defend the Constitution is actually a person who will offend the Constitution.

Lenin is said to have claimed that if he could control the meaning of words, he could control your thoughts and if he could control your thoughts….WAAALLLAAAA you’re his slave. Is that very thing not happening RIGHT NOW as I write this?

Aren’t they trying to convince us that someone who takes an OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION is actually anti government? Stewart Rhodes is on the chopping block with the moronic charges that have been brought against him and a number of other OATH KEEPERS right now because of what took place January 6th 2021. I’ve been trying to keep up with what is going on and it’s pretty hard because no one seems to be able to get close enough BESIDES the lame stream media, which of course would NEVER mislead us.

So I’m going to ask you to take a look at what the Oath Keepers stand for and why they are willing to lay all on the line for YOU and ME.

Stewart did not enter the Capitol and made it clear to the members attending to avoid bringing any weapons to the protest. The prosecution against him is claiming that they were there to overthrow the government. His defense says that all of those with him had intended to defend congress from Antifa and related thuggery. However, the judge, who is supposed to be NEUTRAL has his mind made up. The prosecution is fabricating evidence. And surprise, surprise... the jury has been rigged.

Here is what Steward Rhodes and the Oath Keepers stand for:

The Oath Keeper’s motto is, “Not On Our Watch!” Their pro-American, pro-constitutional oath has been sworn to by all Oath Keepers whether active military, veterans, police officers, national guardsmen, TSA officials, firemen, or peace officers. That Oath is defined clearly in ten separate guarantees to Americans:

Oath Keepers will NOT obey any order to:

• Disarm the American people.

• Conduct warrant-less searches of the American people,

• Detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants”

• Impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.

• Invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

• Blockade American cities, turning them into giant concentration camps.

• Force American citizens into any form of detention camps.

• Assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil.

• Confiscate the property of the American people.

• Infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government adminsters for a redress of grievances.

Does that sound like a group that is ANTI government or is the group that is prosecuting THEM anti government?

And did you know that the Oath Keepers have been involved in TWO major incidents that the government enforcers had to back down from? One was during the time that Obama.

According to Brett Redmayne-Titley in an article he wrote back in 2015, called “The Secret American Army”, I have exerted the following section of the article for your understanding...

“The American Empire has been keeping any news of Oath Keepers out of the media. The regime does not want an example of courage and successful opposition getting to the minds of its subjugated and endemically fearful people. The regime fears the Oath Keepers for a very good reason; this army has already beaten the devil back down below.

Twice.

When the sequestration cuts agreed to by a tepid congress and a flaccid president took effect in late 2013, the Obama administration decided to punish Americans instead for his failure. He proceeded to close the ocean to recreational fishing and boating and closed access to lakes and national parks. His minions in the Forest Service went so far as to ring the famous geyser, “Old Faithful,” a major US tourist attraction, with a twelve-foot high solid plastic fence. This made sure that no one could see and enjoy it. Tourists who went to the third floor of an adjacent hotel to sneak a peek were arrested.

Then the puppet President went too far.

American veterans come from across America to remember their friends and loved ones at the Vietnam and World War II war memorials. During sequestration, Obama closed these too, leaving those who had also traveled hundreds of miles disappointed. This was a call to action for the Oath Keepers.

With the Second Amendment still in force in DC, wearing side arms, and in uniform, the Oath Keepers showed up en-mass. They proceeded to escort arriving visitors past the equally armed Capitol Police and then protected them throughout their visit. To everyone privy to this successful operation, the Oath Keepers were heroes.”

He went on to say:

“They were called again.

Two weeks ago (this was back in 2015 ~Mark) another corrupt US Senator, Harry Reid ( D-NV), tried to use his equally corrupt connections at the Bureau of Land Management to order the US Marshal’s Service to seize Clive Bundy’s Nevada ranch so Reid could lease it to the Chinese. Two hundred-plus people showed up to defend the ranch, with more trying to get there. The siege was turning ugly. Marshalls were tasering peaceful protesters, terrorizing them with dogs and slamming elderly women to the ground in order to elicit a violent reaction by the crowd that would have allowed them a reason to raze the camp. Things were getting very bad. Anyone who left was arrested. Anyone trying to arrive was detained. And more BLM goons were arriving by the hour. We could see the snipers as they zeroed in from their positions on the hill just to the south. Would they shoot? I remembered Houston the whole time.

Then the Oath Keepers arrived.

Armed and ready, several dozen Oath Keepers took up positions and began patrols on Clive Bundy’s property. They directed operations. Defensive perimeters were set up, sandbags stacked and the new terms of engagement established firmly. Everyone helped.

A former Army Colonel walked some three-quarters of a mile down the one-blockaded road towards the US Marshalls along with three other Oath Keepers. All armed, they arrived at the perimeter to speak with whoever was running this operation. While we all stared on through camera lenses and binos a conversation began… our terms… were delivered.

Further violence against protesters would be met with rifle fire. The Bundy Ranch would not be abandoned peacefully. Attempts to breach the perimeter would be resisted as trespassing. No one in the camp wanted violence at any time. It was time to talk.

In reaction, two hours later the BLM forces were multiplying. It was getting worse. But the fuckers were now leaving us alone as a siege commenced.

But then, good journalism, by a good investigative journalist revealed the truth about this stand-off and how BLM had been used for communist purposes.

The standoff in the Nevada desert wasn’t about a desert tortoise or a rancher’s failure to pay grazing fees. It was about the state’s senior senator again enriching himself and his family at public expense.

Sunlight is said to be the best disinfectant, and the end, at least temporarily, to the Bureau of Land Management’s armed standoff with Cliven Bundy was due in part to the exposure given to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s role in the attempt to confiscate Bundy’s cattle and shut down his ranch.

“A tortoise isn’t the reason why BLM is harassing a 67-year-old rancher; they want his land,” journalist and blogger Dana Loesch notes. “The tortoise wasn’t of concern when Harry Reid worked with BLM to change the boundaries of the tortoise’s habitat to accommodate the development of his top donor, Harvey Whittemore.”

Last year, Whittemore, 59, who headed a billion-dollar real estate company, was found guilty by a federal jury on three counts tied to nearly $150,000 illegally funnelled to Reid’s re-election campaign in 2007. Unfortunately, Cliven Bundy was not a Reid donor.

The Bureau of Land Management was at the time headed by former longtime Reid aide Neil Kornze, who was confirmed by the Senate as BLM director on April 8, just as federal authorities descended on the cattle ranch. Kornze, 35, worked as a senior policy adviser on land-use issues in Reid’s office from 2003 to 2011 before joining the BLM.

Coincidentally, part of that solar energy expansion included a plan by China’s ENN Energy Group to build what would be America’s largest solar energy complex. The site chosen with the guidance of Reid’s son, Rory, is in Laughlin, Nev. Laughlin is in Clark County, where Bundy’s ranch is, and where Rory Reid formerly chaired the county commission. Rory is currently a lawyer with the firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins and is representing ENN.

What?!

Reid, who just weeks ago was forced to return campaign money funneled to his granddaughter, has been one of the project’s most prominent advocates, helping recruit the company during a 2011 trip to China and using his political clout on behalf of the project in Nevada.

Knowing that Bundy would not relinquish his land and heritage, the Chinese utilized their congressional asset named Harry Reid, who called BLM and they dutifully trumped up a bunch of reasons to evict Bundy.

With the siege growing in national attention on every major network, and these networks demonizing Bundy and the protesters, when the factual news of the Reid family’s dual national loyalties hit alternative media, legacy media- starting with FOX- splattered duplicitous excrement all over Reid geriatric face and by extension the DNC.

So, two days after Loesch’s revelations hit alternative media and twenty-four hours after Fox picked it up, with interviews, the BLM and its four hundred-plus Federal Marshals went home.

The cheers were deafening and worldwide.

But it can be said, within the meager list of real victories of Americans over their government, that should the Oath Keepers not have furthered their duty- as referenced above- the outcome would have been brutal. Instead, it was victory!

My conversation with Dan and Gene had been enlightening, optimistic, and supportive, but at the same time terrifying. To discover that so many very conservative American active and retired military members are actually of like mind as many passionate pro-American liberal progressives who hold similar radical viewpoints, was surprising and heartening.

Knowing that former members of America’s military had already sworn an oath to protect me, and other Americans, from the very real threat of being shot, or incarcerated without a warrant, by our government was reassuring.

The Oath Keepers will be called to order again soon. Their numbers are legion. Their ranks reportedly growing. Their weapons: many.

With a US government unwilling to change its course straight into a new form of National Socialism, it will not accept a return of freedoms, liberty, or factual discussion.

Many people fear their government. The government does not fear the people. I do not fear the Oath Keeper. I have met them.

Perhaps the reader may now understand why the US government does fear the Oath Keepers.

And, that is terrifying.” ~ Brett Redmayne-Titley for Global Research

I just figured that this information needs to be read and seen by any and all Americans for an honest straight forward point of view of the Oath Keepers.

For you see…

No "law" should exist for a crime unless there is a victim involved. If they are willing to cage or kill you or I for keeping the fruits of our labor, THEY are the criminals, not us. If they are willing to cage or kill you or I enforcing a law telling us that we cannot smoke, eat or drink what we want, THEY are the criminals not us. If they are willing to cage you or I or kill us while enforcing a law that says that we can't own a certain type of gun or because we decide to put an AR pistol to our shoulder, THEY are the CRIMINALS, NOT US. (Direct violation of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!) If they are willing to kill you or I or cage us because we refuse to fight for them in an illegal war of aggression, THEY are the CRIMINALS not us. If they are willing to cage your or I or kill us while enforcing ANY LAW where there cannot be shown that a VICTIM existed, THEY ARE THE CRIMINALS, NOT US. Taking the property of the people without a warrant or probable cause makes THEM the criminal not us. THEFT is THEFT. A badge or "position of authority" does not do away with the fact that THEY are the criminals not me. When those who administer "GOVERNMENT" VIOLATE THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO MORE LAW...JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL. THE CONSTITUTION IS THE GOVERNMENT. Those SWORN to uphold and defend it ARE THE CRIMINALS when they violate their oaths of office AND THAT IS THE FACT JACK!

~FINIS~

~Courageous Lion – HEAR ME ROAR!