Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sharine Borslien's avatar

Thanks for sharing. It seems obvious to me that the writers are underhandedly making a pro-government argument. I prefer to talk about the self-appointed leaders as psychopathic tyrants, and governments and government-like institutions (WEF, et al) as machines for nothing but violence. It's the only way they can get what they want, and they have mastered all the methods — psychological, biological, economical, and so on — of implementing that violence. Government is slavery, no matter what name it is given. We are the rightful beneficiaries of Planet Earth, and the wayward wizards use their black magic to fool a lot of people into pretending to give up their Creator-given rights. So, I don't mind if they plan to destroy the state; my concern is living in abundance and freedom despite what constructs they force into place as their "remedy."

Expand full comment
Allie Byrd's avatar

The Cloward-Piven approach? Someone must have read Hegel.

".... evidence of a stealthily orchestrated operation conducted by agents of the state acting on behalf of their elite benefactors?"

Me thinks so.

Agenda: Problem, Solution, Implementation. Thesis, antithesis, synthesis

Some have been screaming about the NWO, the stealth actions and their actors for decades...The Tin Foil hats aren't so stupid after all.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts