Uncensored: Foreigners Will Be Able To Choose Our Next President

Uncensored-Published May 7, 2024-14 mins

“If the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting, in violation of the subsection, that well, the alien the code says if the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting that he or she was a citizen of the United States, that they are subject to no prosecution.” Within Title 18 US Code

To watch the video you need to subscribed to Tucker Carlson Network. I did. This information literally has to get out or we are royally SCREWED! C.L.

https://tuckercarlson.com/uncensored-catherine-engelbrecht

EPISODE DETAILS

There is a little-known law that could allow non-citizens to vote in the upcoming 2024 presidential election. What is this law, and how do we stop illegal immigrants from stealing the election for Joe Biden? True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht joined Tucker to sound the alarm.

READ THE TRANSCRIPT

Tucker [00:00:00] So over the past, say ten years, our leaders, that would be the Democratic Party, the so-called business community and in fact, a lot of Republican leaders have allowed into our country against federal law and against our will tens of millions of foreigners. Now the question is, why have they done this? And by the way, we should say not just let them in, but paid for them to come either overland through Latin America, through Mexico and our southern border, or by plane from the rest of the world. American citizens paid for that. And of course, when they arrive, they receive the entire suite of federal benefits, also at the expense of taxpayers. But the question remains why? Why would you bring in this many people in such a short period against the law now, previous generations, the motive was really obvious. Farmers, for example, wanted cheap labor. We needed the help. Or that was the argument anyway. But no one is making that argument now because you can't make it. There is no economic justification for bringing in tens of millions of people with lower than average educational attainment and no modern skills. That's exactly what we've done, because of course, we don't need the help at all. We don't have a manufacturing sector. Agriculture is largely automated. And of course, AI is about to render a lot of American workers obsolete as jobs that people do will now be done by machines. So there is no way to justify an economic grounds mass immigration in 2024. So once again, why is it happening? And it's happening for political reasons. It's happening because the Democratic Party has ceased making the case for itself to Americans. And so in order to keep power, in fact to expand their power and to preside over the one party state that they desire, they're going to need a brand new electorate. And this is their electorate. Foreigners will choose your leaders. You're not allowed to choose the leaders of foreign countries, but foreigners will choose your leaders, including in this election, this 2024 presidential election. Well, how would that work? It's illegal, you say? For illegal aliens to vote in a federal election. Well, actually, it's not illegal. It turns out Congress passed something in the U.S. code. The federal code, a line that, unbeknownst to the rest of us, makes it legal for illegal aliens to vote in federal elections if they believe they are citizens. It's a state of mind. Did you know that? We didn't know that. Most people didn't know that. Catherine Engelbrecht just found this provision in the US code. That's the kind of thing she reads because she's the founder of True the Vote and has been working on these issues for a few years now. And she joins us to explain what she's found. Katherine Ulbrich, thank you so much for coming on.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:02:51] Oh, thank you for having me.

Tucker [00:02:53] So would you mind explaining what seems, at first blush, a very far fetched idea that the US code as of right now, as of our speaking, would allow illegal aliens to vote in the upcoming presidential election. How would that work?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:03:07] Yeah, well, through the vote, the organization I founded some years ago has been long involved in looking at the accuracy of the voter rolls, and we've long maintained that inaccurate voter rolls lead to inaccurate elections. So with that as a backdrop, we've been very concerned about the lack of availability to determine citizenship status, not just by groups like ours, but by states themselves. They can't they can't get close enough to a citizenship status database to make good determinations. That then led me to look a little deeper because, as you rightly lay out, there's a motivation here. So what might that be? We've seen many, many videos of people coming across the border who are talking about their excitement about voting for Joe Biden and claiming that they are citizens. But yet we hear debates in Congress where the congressman will say, you can't. Don't worry. Non-citizens can't vote. Who? It's a it's a crime of perjury. It's a felony. So, okay, we took a deep look at the Criminal code, and title 18 left us just gobsmacked because when you read all the way through it, as it lists all of the, stipulations against non-citizen voting in federal elections and lays out the penalties, therefore, scroll all the way down to the fine print. And what you read is that non-citizens can vote without penalty if at the time they are voting, they believe themselves to be U.S. citizens.

Tucker [00:04:47] Well, I mean, that seems insane. I mean, I'm taking your word for it. I'm not a lawyer or an expert in the federal code, but is there any other crime? Like, if I can show that I didn't know I was robbing a liquor store, had a gun in my hand. I was demanding money, but I didn't really think it was robbery. Does that shield me from being prosecuted for robbing a liquor store?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:05:07] No. Certainly not. But I will say that the state of mind idea is something that, we've come up against in the past related to domicile. As we've done reviews of the voter rolls and you see people that are registered, but they're registered to vacant lots, they're registered to fast food restaurants and the the press, the press. You get back from the state as well. But, you know, residency is a state of mind. This takes that to an entirely different level. And I'll tell you what I'm really concerned about, Tucker, is that when we lived through 2020 and we saw the landscape change, lawlessness take hold, we just we watched on the sidelines and said, surely this can't be what it looks like is happening. Surely this move to the mass mail of ballots and unmonitored dropboxes and and third party election workers that have no proper training to support all of the ebbs and flows of process. Surely this can't be what's about to play out. And then when it did, you're left with scant few days to try to pick up the pieces and prove what really happened. I'm seeing this now play out. In 2024 on this issue. Much the same. And so it's my hope that we can awaken Americans to this problem and demand accountability before November so that we can decide if citizenship is truly a state of mind.

Tucker [00:06:37] So can I ask about the law itself, the code that you're referring to? Do you think that that suggests that the the foreigner, because the proposition here is that we're allowing foreigners to choose our leaders, which is insane, of course. But is is the law written in such a way that that foreigner will not be punished for voting in our elections? But will that vote still count? Is that clear?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:07:01] Well, it's a great question, but you know, you that mean the ballots are anonymous. So once that ballot has been cast either by mail and it's been separated from the envelope with which it's carried to the central count, so you can't tell who voted, if that's if that's been separated, the envelope from the ballot. And certainly by machine you can't tell. So no, there's no way there's no way to pull this back. It's it's why it is critical that we get on the front side of this and have a, a very national discussion about the, the tracks we're heading down. This is a very, very dangerous proposition. And I believe it's been kept quiet, for such a time as this.

Tucker [00:07:45] So just to be clear, once foreign nationals, foreigners have voted in our elections, and I don't think we're not allowed to choose China's president, are we? I don't think we are. But once their citizens choose ours, along with citizens from countries all over the world, they're once they vote, there's literally nothing we can do about it. We have to live with. Live forever. Yeah, live with the outcome.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:08:05] But live with the outcome. And then, you know, good luck in trying to prove this because there the voter rolls nationally are are a joke. I mean, in private industry, all day, every day, private companies are resolving identity, residency and citizenship in real time. The data exists to do this. The technology exists to do this. I mean, my word. You know, Google knows every time my heart beats, data is there and available to track what you want to track. But yet the states are not given any access to databases that would help determine citizenship at scale. They are given sort of a backdoor access to a database called save, where you can check one one application at a time. It's just not a reasonable solution. So it's this is something that I truly believe we could wake up the day after the election and say what has just happened, and there's no way to undo it at that point. We've got to get ahead of it. We've got to have this debate. Now, what does it mean to be a citizen? Is it truly a state of mind when it comes to voting rights?

Tucker [00:09:11] I mean, I don't think there's much of a debate there, right?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:09:15] It shouldn't be.

Tucker [00:09:15] I can't imagine that anyone would take in public anyway. They never defend their positions at all anyway. But I don't think you could find a person. You could say, yes, a foreigner ought to be allowed to choose your leaders because he thinks he's a citizen. Like, would anyone make that argument?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:09:31] You you wouldn't think so. But somebody did, because it's our law. It is in title 18 of the U.S. Criminal Code that says point blank. If the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting in, in violation of the subsection, that well, the alien the code says if the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting that he or she was a citizen of the United States, that they are subject to no prosecution. I've shown this to legislators. I've shown this code to immigration attorneys, I've shown it to our legal counsel. And and they all just they just look back with a blank stare, like, how, how how could this have been? But it is it is quite literally the last stipulation in this section of code. So you've got to read it all the way down to the fine print. I just so happened to read it, and this is where we find ourselves to.

Tucker [00:10:27] Is there, any question that the overwhelming majority of illegal aliens are going to vote Democrat when when they vote and they will vote?

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:10:36] You know, I certainly see that the NGOs and the outfits that are bringing them across the country are grooming them for that purpose. That that seems to be very apparent. They are they are immediately, given access to all manner of social service programs. Those social service programs have as a, as a portion of the application and automatic voter registration feature. States aren't allowed to ask for citizenship, proof of citizenship upon registration. I mean, this is layer upon layer upon layer of dysfunction.

Tucker [00:11:08] The Biden administration is registering illegal aliens to vote when they get here.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:11:13] They certainly are setting up all of the, of the. The place settings to do it. They are registering them for government sanctioned programs like Medicaid, like the Affordable Care Act. They're giving them access to food stamps, lodging, other welfare types of programs. All of those programs come with the with the application, a opt out voter registration. So it is it is not at all beyond the realm of possibility that is that it's in fact exactly what's happening, that non-citizens are being registered, States have no ability to stop it. And if you are so fortunate as to find a way to prove this caught in the act, then you refer back to title 18 that says that was just a state of mind. So no harm, no foul and it will be too late.

Tucker [00:12:07] I mean, so the election already seems rigged.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:12:10] If we don't do something about it, I believe that that's. That's the going to be the likely outcome. You know, I lived through it in 2020. So many. It was 1000 front war. There was so much that was happening. Lawlessness reigned. We are seeing the same type of engineered chaos today, but we have an opportunity to get ahead of it. We just must demand it. We must demand a transparent audit of voter rolls to make sure that those who are registered meet the criteria for identity, residency and citizenship. Data exists to do that. Technology exists to do that. Totally totally achievable. We must demand it because this trap door, this threatens everything we know about our constitutional Republic.

Tucker [00:12:55] Does seem like the system's ending. I don't want it to end, but, this is show nuts. And if the people who administer the system are intent on destroying it, it's kind of hard to know how. You know it continues.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:13:08] I, I share your concern. Being this close to our election process is I have been through true the vote for this many years. It does seem like the fix is in. But the American people are the reason for hope. There is there's nothing that we can't do if we stick together and impress any given issue. This is just one that you know no, nobody seems to know about. Certainly we didn't until just not too long ago. I've not talked about it publicly until now, because I wanted to make sure that I understood that what I was reading carried the weight that it seems to carry. And I've not found anybody to, dissuade me from this belief. It is it is troubling is an understatement.

Tucker [00:13:59] Well, yeah, it certainly is. I don't even have any more questions because I'm so bothered by what you just said. I hope you'll come back. Catherine Engelbrecht, thank you very much.

Catherine Engelbrecht [00:14:06] Thank you.

---