I have been looking at these drone shots of after the fire since they first emerged. Closely. Three observations — and I invite people to look the shots over, slow speed, frame by frame, using zoom. Compare with other post-fire color aerial vids and please honestly assess. I’d like anyone’s honest input.
My observations:
1) The footage appears to be in grey-scale, or in a lowered saturation level — unlike the subtly varied soft grey tones we see in some other “after” color aerial vids & pics and in nature.
2. The grey-scale is interrupted in spots by what does appear to be enhanced, tinted objects and areas. Note bleeding color(!), identical hues on different and disparate objects (as with a limited pallet) —Look at all colors closely.
Note this and “oversprays” — the first roofs, the yellow grassy area, trees, the featured blue car, and too much flatness of color, as on the last umbrella. Keep an open mind. If this is tampered footage, surely you would want to know.
3) Editing appears to obliquely feature blue or blue-green objects. Other incidental colors, often-muted reds & greens (and there’s the yellow swath), may vary slightly in intensity, from object to object, but we see a very limited pallet. The multiple hues here & there helps lend realism; a red hue helps set off a blue-green object.
All told, it looks like a hacked bit of hand tinting on grey-scale.
There seems to be a good deal of effort made to seed and confirm certain narratives, to lead people to certain conclusions. That is, to influence the very same people who understood the truths surrounding the whole covid/vac consp & psyop and we are now predisposed to look behind the surface of stories for the REAL story. My question becomes, then, what would be the point of misleading these, us, the skeptics? The point of using this skepticism against them? Could that skepticism have come so far that it’s susceptible to being played — become a weak spot to exploit? A susceptibility for anything that smells like “conspiracy”.
Or would it be a Maui local’s home-grown effort to sow anger and action at home? I really don’t know what to think — only that the notions started very soon after and that it was subtly seeded. These subliminally suggestive clips spread over the world. Form a basis for theories that quickly morphed into accepted fact.
If I’m mistaken about thinking these clips (like others) are photoshopped, please weigh in, but do look with impartial eyes. The near-monochromatic nature of the natural scene does make a greyscale version slide in easily under the radar. If you have knowledge of how this bleeding of colors happens commonly in un-doctored drone or other videos or if you notice it looks shopped too, and if you think it is indeed a “thing”, please comment. If it is altered, it’s dishonest and purposefully misleading — We would then need to ask Why.
What I have notice before is that blurring can occur due to movement and since the scenes everywhere including pictures from the street of burned out cars on 911, it makes me think that if anything it was the blue bleeding over due to the speed of the camera taking the pictures and any movement by the photographer. It may not be gray scale, it just may be that the way everything burned up it makes it appear to be gray scale. That's how the 911 pictures look too. Do you have any links to something you've done to show what you are saying? I'm working slowly but surely on a post that shows the 911 comparison to Maui.
Except that the RNC and the DNC haven't destroyed thousands of homes and murdered people directly. INDIRECTLY, yes, most assuredly. As a matter of fact there has to have been some major collusion with the CCP on that Island for all those "coincidences" that took place.
Apparently you don't have an understanding of capitalism outside of what is called CRONY capitalism. True free market capitalism is good for all of us. And as for the first part of your statement... "The CCP hasn't destroyed anything that it prevented from existing." Please explain. I am not able to grasp what you are trying to communicate.
I'm of the opinion that when someone wants to get their point across they shouldn't shift the responsibility of being clearly understood to their intended audience. Unless obfuscation is the point of communication, clarity is charity. Anyway, "The CCP hasn't destroyed anything that it prevented from existing " seems to imply that "anything" that doesn't exist cannot be destroyed. The CCP prevented this thing from existing. I guess they didn't destroy anything then? They only prevented anything having to be destroyed? Gotta love a good riddle, lol.
Re the aerial footage used in the vid:
I have been looking at these drone shots of after the fire since they first emerged. Closely. Three observations — and I invite people to look the shots over, slow speed, frame by frame, using zoom. Compare with other post-fire color aerial vids and please honestly assess. I’d like anyone’s honest input.
My observations:
1) The footage appears to be in grey-scale, or in a lowered saturation level — unlike the subtly varied soft grey tones we see in some other “after” color aerial vids & pics and in nature.
2. The grey-scale is interrupted in spots by what does appear to be enhanced, tinted objects and areas. Note bleeding color(!), identical hues on different and disparate objects (as with a limited pallet) —Look at all colors closely.
Note this and “oversprays” — the first roofs, the yellow grassy area, trees, the featured blue car, and too much flatness of color, as on the last umbrella. Keep an open mind. If this is tampered footage, surely you would want to know.
3) Editing appears to obliquely feature blue or blue-green objects. Other incidental colors, often-muted reds & greens (and there’s the yellow swath), may vary slightly in intensity, from object to object, but we see a very limited pallet. The multiple hues here & there helps lend realism; a red hue helps set off a blue-green object.
All told, it looks like a hacked bit of hand tinting on grey-scale.
There seems to be a good deal of effort made to seed and confirm certain narratives, to lead people to certain conclusions. That is, to influence the very same people who understood the truths surrounding the whole covid/vac consp & psyop and we are now predisposed to look behind the surface of stories for the REAL story. My question becomes, then, what would be the point of misleading these, us, the skeptics? The point of using this skepticism against them? Could that skepticism have come so far that it’s susceptible to being played — become a weak spot to exploit? A susceptibility for anything that smells like “conspiracy”.
Or would it be a Maui local’s home-grown effort to sow anger and action at home? I really don’t know what to think — only that the notions started very soon after and that it was subtly seeded. These subliminally suggestive clips spread over the world. Form a basis for theories that quickly morphed into accepted fact.
If I’m mistaken about thinking these clips (like others) are photoshopped, please weigh in, but do look with impartial eyes. The near-monochromatic nature of the natural scene does make a greyscale version slide in easily under the radar. If you have knowledge of how this bleeding of colors happens commonly in un-doctored drone or other videos or if you notice it looks shopped too, and if you think it is indeed a “thing”, please comment. If it is altered, it’s dishonest and purposefully misleading — We would then need to ask Why.
Thanks.
What I have notice before is that blurring can occur due to movement and since the scenes everywhere including pictures from the street of burned out cars on 911, it makes me think that if anything it was the blue bleeding over due to the speed of the camera taking the pictures and any movement by the photographer. It may not be gray scale, it just may be that the way everything burned up it makes it appear to be gray scale. That's how the 911 pictures look too. Do you have any links to something you've done to show what you are saying? I'm working slowly but surely on a post that shows the 911 comparison to Maui.
Will get back on this. Very much appreciate your reply.
-D
Absolutely believable!!
Remember the Chinese satellite shooting lasers reported back in February? Coincidence?
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/experts-believe-chinese-satellite-fired-green-lasers-hawaii?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1247
Except that the RNC and the DNC haven't destroyed thousands of homes and murdered people directly. INDIRECTLY, yes, most assuredly. As a matter of fact there has to have been some major collusion with the CCP on that Island for all those "coincidences" that took place.
Apparently you don't have an understanding of capitalism outside of what is called CRONY capitalism. True free market capitalism is good for all of us. And as for the first part of your statement... "The CCP hasn't destroyed anything that it prevented from existing." Please explain. I am not able to grasp what you are trying to communicate.
LOL! Maybe I don't understand "plain English". I'm from the US.
I'm of the opinion that when someone wants to get their point across they shouldn't shift the responsibility of being clearly understood to their intended audience. Unless obfuscation is the point of communication, clarity is charity. Anyway, "The CCP hasn't destroyed anything that it prevented from existing " seems to imply that "anything" that doesn't exist cannot be destroyed. The CCP prevented this thing from existing. I guess they didn't destroy anything then? They only prevented anything having to be destroyed? Gotta love a good riddle, lol.