Common law trial by jury is how a nation governs itself equitably. The people, through a jury, are the sovereign supreme power by judging on the moral legitimacy of all acts of enforcement. There's a few things in this article that are not quite right but the more people that understand that a nation governs itself through the jury, the better.
Religion must never be conflated with constitutional law. The constitution is a microcosm of the macrocosmic natural law. The 10 commandments are religionist rules from the most altered book in the world. All religion is moral relativism-the second tenet of the satanic mindset. Objective morality is the governing dynamic of human freedom and is behavioural consequence woven into the fabric of reality. Objective morality (natural law) is the science of morality and has to be aligned with individually. Trial b y jury is a secular framework of natural justice.
The constitution provides equity - all being equal under the law. Without equity a community strays from natural law. Without equity, by default, there is vigilantism, oppression and injustice. Trial by judge is a breach of equity because it is the government determining the parameters of justice and it removes the protection and wisdom of our peers.
The American constitution is actually illegitimate because it prescribes the requirements for the office of President, which automatically involves party politics which is the elevation of majority opinion above reasonable doubt and conscience. Authentic common law does not prescribe party politics. The political model was a result of the aftermath of the Dutch coup d'état of 1688 in England which led to the treasonous Bill of Rights which unconstitutionally placed wealth qualifications on jurors. The same model was repackaged and inserted into the American constitution making it a Republic. England now is essentially a republic due to the political model.
England’s original Magna Carta constitution is legitimate because it is a constitutional limited monarchy that precludes the tyranny of politics. The common law is this; jurors, on a jury, delivering a verdict according to conscience. No one is immune from cost free private prosecution under the authentic constitutional rule of law-no grand Jury required. This applies to any criminality contained within any legislation (see my most recent article).
So,
1: We live in alignment with natural law; my rights end where yours begin.
2: In the event of a dispute or a crime, the matter is dealt with in a court of conscience - trial by jury.
3: We appoint a King 9wise elder) who promises to the people, through the coronation oath, to enforce the will of the jury as the executive.
So, the primary role of the King and his administration is to help the people govern themselves by enforcing the will of the jury and upholding and preserving the framework in which the people are the supreme judges in all matters of justice. This is “government” in it’s original, legitimate form.
Excellent history lesson. However, since we are dealing with indoctrinated government school people, we need to keep it as simple as possible. I find that a short summary to show them the reality of WHY we need juries to be cognizant of the REASON the founding fathers utilized the concept. Basically to judge the law and determine if it was a law that they wanted enforced on themselves if they were in the defendants situation. Once the reality for the reason sets in, it matters not what you’ve been charged with and all victimless crime “laws” end up under close scrutiny to the initiated so that they can nullify the use of it on there fellow man. Born Again Republic by Red Beckman didn’t get into all the historical facts. He simply laid it out in simple enough terms that anyone who read the book could understand it.
So your history lesson though very interesting isn’t something I’d hammer a government school graduate with.
As for your ending statement? Religion must never be conflated with constitutional law. The constitution is a microcosm of the macrocosmic natural law. The 10 commandments are religionist rules from the most altered book in the world. All religion is moral relativism-the second tenet of the satanic mindset. Anyone who claims to be a Christian is basing their reality on what they have “learned” from that most altered book in the world, which you claim it is. Showing me that you base your morality on something besides the Word Of God, which I for one try to as best I can. Simply put the tenants of the Bible can be summed up in Love God with all your heart, mind body and soul and love your neighbor as yourself. Or do no harm. Where you get your morality from has to be either from an external source or an internal one. If it is internal, some “people” don’t have that capacity. If you understand the common law it is because you are an Israelite as described in Jeremiah 31 vs 31.
Objective morality is gods law because it's behavioural consequence woven into the fabric of reality. Objective morality is found through logic and reason.
Calvin, reason and logic are attributes give us by God. Using them to come to critical thought out results are what we are supposed to be doing with them. The government school is a detriment to all who attend as they make every effort to keep you from the truth. Isaiah 1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together," says the LORD: "Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." Ref: Jeremiah 31vs31 Hebrews Understand who the bible is written to is a major stumbling block for many Christians. So you see, the LORD uses REASON and tells us to do so also. There is no such thing as “Constitutional Law”. The Constitution sets up a government and LAWS are SUPPOSED to be in agreement with what it says. The Bill of Rights are PROHIBITIONS against the agents of government. Many folks call the people who administer government, government. The US Constitution is what brings their jobs and positions into existence.
Your intellect is making something simple into something so complicated as the average person with an average intelligence. And a video that is almost 30 minutes is not a short video. The JURY is the ultimate arbiter of the law and they need to KNOW what they don’t. Once the judge tells a jury they can’t judge the law, he is a LIAR and should be impeached.
What I'm saying is that natural law is gods law - a spiritual law of behavioural consequence that is discerned through logic and reason by aligning with objective morality- no religion or scripture needed!
The jury is constitutional common law! It's equal justice in alignment with natural law. I would advise watching that 30 min video about the dangers of denying the constitution because it lays it out extremely simply. It's about principles of natural justice that, if not aligned with, create chaos for a community.
Thank you for this expose. If I ever get called to jury duty I'll remember this. Even though my Dad was an attorney, I didn't learn this, possibly because he wasn't a trial lawyer.
Extrapolating this to Dr. Phil, apparently he was guilty of nullifying jurors with his trial science company, which strove to stack the jury with people with certain attitudes and outlooks that would be beneficial to whatever case he was involved in. This has been incorporated into the entertainment sphere with the TV show "Bull",
Which is why mass education of how the people own the law in jury independence is the solution to restoring legitimate governance and order. Restoration of common law trial by jury is the sole peaceful means of restoring justice.
Good luck with the "mass education". You have to get through the fog that has been placed in their minds. After all.. Caesar is lord, don't you know? So between the twisted logic of churchianity and the gooverment skewl cistern, we have quite the challenge to administer mass education. Think about it...25 likes, 24 comments and 12 restacks since August of 2025. And I have almost 3000 subscribers. That is what I mean. It doesn't look interesting enough to most I guess. They like being told what to do.
Then there is the subject of common law. I like this statement by a reader of Fruit From a Poisonous Tree… "In 1954 I began my legal practice as an assistant district attorney in the city of Miami. We switched from common law pleading to statutory pleading and no one asked why. Now I know the answer, and it depresses me to no end."~ Ralph G. Mitchell, JD, Attorney at Law, St. Augustine, Florida.
We need to get back TO the common law because that would eliminate thousands upon thousands of victimless “crimes”.
Subtitle: How Prohibition Exposed the Power of the Private Membership Association
Introduction: When Freedom Went Underground
History has an odd way of teaching us the same lesson twice. During America’s Prohibition era—a time when the state tried to outlaw a glass of wine between friends—the very concept of liberty retreated underground. Ordinary people who had once lived freely found themselves living like fugitives for wanting to share a drink, make their own remedies, or conduct honest trade. Yet, in that period of public suppression, a quiet revolution was taking place in the private realm. The private membership association, or PMA, became the hidden refuge of the free man. It was the tavern door that never shut, the contract that never bowed to the king.
What began as a simple method to keep the authorities at bay became, in essence, the lawful expression of self-governance.
I often reflect on how that era mirrored today’s encroachment of government overreach—medical, economic, even moral. In every age where the state overextends itself, men and women rediscover what it means to live privately. Prohibition merely made this visible. It drew a sharp line between two worlds: the public, where everything is controlled, and the private, where the human spirit remains untamed.
So you are saying the 10 commands are written on the hearts of man? Which 10? The 10 of the Communist manifesto? That seems to be the ones that most follow and adhere too. The 10 commandments are laws. you are contradicting yourself.
You said. "Laws won’t change a man’s heart. " and then you say that the 10 commandments are written on mans hearts. That reads as contradictory to me.
Fact is, in my mind, there are some of the 10 commandments that are NOT written on the heart of men. The first four as an example. And the one against adultery. The common understanding these days as to what adultery is, is NOT what it was in the beginning. In the beginning it was understood to be mixing the blood of the races. Adulterating it. And interesting enough at one time before marriage LICENSES that was a common understanding. You see a license is permission to something unlawful. The first one issued was so that a black and white could "marry". I have no idea what day sabbath is.. No one does these days. The 7th Day Adventists say Saturday. Typical churchianity says Sunday. There are some in the Christian Identity crowd that believe it rotates every year. What does it mean to take the lords name in vain? What is an idol? What does it mean by have no other gods before me? Is god's name Yahweh? If so, isn't claiming someone else is God contradicting that commandment? Who is damaged by violating the first four commandments and can the victim come into a court of law to defend the case?
Is there a commandment that says "Thou shalt not rape?" And OBVIOUISLY that is a law written on our hearts, I would assume. Any CRIME that has a victim involved should be obvious to the person committing the act that they are a criminal. If you violate a victimless crime law, are you a law breaker or is the law itself a violator of the law. The law being DO NO HARM. If the law causes harm to the person violating it, and there is no victim stated in the law isn't that law nothing but tyranny? Did Randy Weaver's wife and son die because he violated a law written on his heart or were they murdered because Randy didn't pay $200 for a "tax stamp" when he modified a shotgun below the "legal" length?
The precepts of the Bible can all be summed up in two sentences... LOVE YAHWEH YOUR GOD with ALL YOUR BEING and LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF. The law and the prophets rest on these two greatest commandments.
Get over it. Look at what you can do in the position that you'll be in. Maybe you'll be able to free someone like Matt Hoover who was railroaded because the jury was 12 ignorant people who followed the lying judge's instructions. I don't remember, when I was on a jury having to swear. It was the witnesses who did.
The two greatest guarantees of justice, liberty and peace are the power of a jury to rule on both the facts and the law, and a populace who are on the whole moral and well informed to make up such a jury.
Common law trial by jury is how a nation governs itself equitably. The people, through a jury, are the sovereign supreme power by judging on the moral legitimacy of all acts of enforcement. There's a few things in this article that are not quite right but the more people that understand that a nation governs itself through the jury, the better.
The best source of info is here.
commonlawconstitution.org
What is not quite right? I’m willing to update if you are willing to share an obvious instance of error.
Religion must never be conflated with constitutional law. The constitution is a microcosm of the macrocosmic natural law. The 10 commandments are religionist rules from the most altered book in the world. All religion is moral relativism-the second tenet of the satanic mindset. Objective morality is the governing dynamic of human freedom and is behavioural consequence woven into the fabric of reality. Objective morality (natural law) is the science of morality and has to be aligned with individually. Trial b y jury is a secular framework of natural justice.
The constitution provides equity - all being equal under the law. Without equity a community strays from natural law. Without equity, by default, there is vigilantism, oppression and injustice. Trial by judge is a breach of equity because it is the government determining the parameters of justice and it removes the protection and wisdom of our peers.
The American constitution is actually illegitimate because it prescribes the requirements for the office of President, which automatically involves party politics which is the elevation of majority opinion above reasonable doubt and conscience. Authentic common law does not prescribe party politics. The political model was a result of the aftermath of the Dutch coup d'état of 1688 in England which led to the treasonous Bill of Rights which unconstitutionally placed wealth qualifications on jurors. The same model was repackaged and inserted into the American constitution making it a Republic. England now is essentially a republic due to the political model.
England’s original Magna Carta constitution is legitimate because it is a constitutional limited monarchy that precludes the tyranny of politics. The common law is this; jurors, on a jury, delivering a verdict according to conscience. No one is immune from cost free private prosecution under the authentic constitutional rule of law-no grand Jury required. This applies to any criminality contained within any legislation (see my most recent article).
So,
1: We live in alignment with natural law; my rights end where yours begin.
2: In the event of a dispute or a crime, the matter is dealt with in a court of conscience - trial by jury.
3: We appoint a King 9wise elder) who promises to the people, through the coronation oath, to enforce the will of the jury as the executive.
So, the primary role of the King and his administration is to help the people govern themselves by enforcing the will of the jury and upholding and preserving the framework in which the people are the supreme judges in all matters of justice. This is “government” in it’s original, legitimate form.
Excellent history lesson. However, since we are dealing with indoctrinated government school people, we need to keep it as simple as possible. I find that a short summary to show them the reality of WHY we need juries to be cognizant of the REASON the founding fathers utilized the concept. Basically to judge the law and determine if it was a law that they wanted enforced on themselves if they were in the defendants situation. Once the reality for the reason sets in, it matters not what you’ve been charged with and all victimless crime “laws” end up under close scrutiny to the initiated so that they can nullify the use of it on there fellow man. Born Again Republic by Red Beckman didn’t get into all the historical facts. He simply laid it out in simple enough terms that anyone who read the book could understand it.
So your history lesson though very interesting isn’t something I’d hammer a government school graduate with.
As for your ending statement? Religion must never be conflated with constitutional law. The constitution is a microcosm of the macrocosmic natural law. The 10 commandments are religionist rules from the most altered book in the world. All religion is moral relativism-the second tenet of the satanic mindset. Anyone who claims to be a Christian is basing their reality on what they have “learned” from that most altered book in the world, which you claim it is. Showing me that you base your morality on something besides the Word Of God, which I for one try to as best I can. Simply put the tenants of the Bible can be summed up in Love God with all your heart, mind body and soul and love your neighbor as yourself. Or do no harm. Where you get your morality from has to be either from an external source or an internal one. If it is internal, some “people” don’t have that capacity. If you understand the common law it is because you are an Israelite as described in Jeremiah 31 vs 31.
Objective morality is gods law because it's behavioural consequence woven into the fabric of reality. Objective morality is found through logic and reason.
I did a short on it here https://youtube.com/shorts/He-OTxMi7GQ?si=rnB6ZAoomECo824N
As for simplicity regarding constitutional law, this short video is a must watch.
https://youtu.be/RTguNsozOc8?si=1F0bI8Z3fuyQIX__
Calvin, reason and logic are attributes give us by God. Using them to come to critical thought out results are what we are supposed to be doing with them. The government school is a detriment to all who attend as they make every effort to keep you from the truth. Isaiah 1:18 "Come now, and let us reason together," says the LORD: "Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." Ref: Jeremiah 31vs31 Hebrews Understand who the bible is written to is a major stumbling block for many Christians. So you see, the LORD uses REASON and tells us to do so also. There is no such thing as “Constitutional Law”. The Constitution sets up a government and LAWS are SUPPOSED to be in agreement with what it says. The Bill of Rights are PROHIBITIONS against the agents of government. Many folks call the people who administer government, government. The US Constitution is what brings their jobs and positions into existence.
Your intellect is making something simple into something so complicated as the average person with an average intelligence. And a video that is almost 30 minutes is not a short video. The JURY is the ultimate arbiter of the law and they need to KNOW what they don’t. Once the judge tells a jury they can’t judge the law, he is a LIAR and should be impeached.
What I'm saying is that natural law is gods law - a spiritual law of behavioural consequence that is discerned through logic and reason by aligning with objective morality- no religion or scripture needed!
The jury is constitutional common law! It's equal justice in alignment with natural law. I would advise watching that 30 min video about the dangers of denying the constitution because it lays it out extremely simply. It's about principles of natural justice that, if not aligned with, create chaos for a community.
Thank you for this expose. If I ever get called to jury duty I'll remember this. Even though my Dad was an attorney, I didn't learn this, possibly because he wasn't a trial lawyer.
Extrapolating this to Dr. Phil, apparently he was guilty of nullifying jurors with his trial science company, which strove to stack the jury with people with certain attitudes and outlooks that would be beneficial to whatever case he was involved in. This has been incorporated into the entertainment sphere with the TV show "Bull",
Jury Nullification has been forgotten… because the people that would be held in check want you to forget it.
Which is why mass education of how the people own the law in jury independence is the solution to restoring legitimate governance and order. Restoration of common law trial by jury is the sole peaceful means of restoring justice.
Good luck with the "mass education". You have to get through the fog that has been placed in their minds. After all.. Caesar is lord, don't you know? So between the twisted logic of churchianity and the gooverment skewl cistern, we have quite the challenge to administer mass education. Think about it...25 likes, 24 comments and 12 restacks since August of 2025. And I have almost 3000 subscribers. That is what I mean. It doesn't look interesting enough to most I guess. They like being told what to do.
Then there is the subject of common law. I like this statement by a reader of Fruit From a Poisonous Tree… "In 1954 I began my legal practice as an assistant district attorney in the city of Miami. We switched from common law pleading to statutory pleading and no one asked why. Now I know the answer, and it depresses me to no end."~ Ralph G. Mitchell, JD, Attorney at Law, St. Augustine, Florida.
We need to get back TO the common law because that would eliminate thousands upon thousands of victimless “crimes”.
Absolutely.
Essay 2: Liberty Behind Closed Doors
Subtitle: How Prohibition Exposed the Power of the Private Membership Association
Introduction: When Freedom Went Underground
History has an odd way of teaching us the same lesson twice. During America’s Prohibition era—a time when the state tried to outlaw a glass of wine between friends—the very concept of liberty retreated underground. Ordinary people who had once lived freely found themselves living like fugitives for wanting to share a drink, make their own remedies, or conduct honest trade. Yet, in that period of public suppression, a quiet revolution was taking place in the private realm. The private membership association, or PMA, became the hidden refuge of the free man. It was the tavern door that never shut, the contract that never bowed to the king.
What began as a simple method to keep the authorities at bay became, in essence, the lawful expression of self-governance.
I often reflect on how that era mirrored today’s encroachment of government overreach—medical, economic, even moral. In every age where the state overextends itself, men and women rediscover what it means to live privately. Prohibition merely made this visible. It drew a sharp line between two worlds: the public, where everything is controlled, and the private, where the human spirit remains untamed.
I. The Hidden Engine of Prohibition
Read more link:
https://prosepma.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?p=199#p199
Great article, CL!!
I know we live in a fallen world, but all we need is the Ten Commandments that is written on the hearts of man.
Laws won’t change a man’s heart. Only Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior can do that !!!
So you are saying the 10 commands are written on the hearts of man? Which 10? The 10 of the Communist manifesto? That seems to be the ones that most follow and adhere too. The 10 commandments are laws. you are contradicting yourself.
Gods law, The Ten Commandments given to us by the Lord through Moses is written on the hearts of men as explained in the Bible.
We all know murder is wrong. We all know lying is wrong. We all know steeling is wrong etc.
Yes most follow their own laws and that’s why they need a change of heart which only Jesus Christ can provide.
I am just pointing out that man has a free will to choose despite the law, be it from God or man.
I don’t believe what I have stated is contradictory at all.
I just stated what the Bible tells us.
Lying is not ALWAYS wrong.
You said. "Laws won’t change a man’s heart. " and then you say that the 10 commandments are written on mans hearts. That reads as contradictory to me.
Fact is, in my mind, there are some of the 10 commandments that are NOT written on the heart of men. The first four as an example. And the one against adultery. The common understanding these days as to what adultery is, is NOT what it was in the beginning. In the beginning it was understood to be mixing the blood of the races. Adulterating it. And interesting enough at one time before marriage LICENSES that was a common understanding. You see a license is permission to something unlawful. The first one issued was so that a black and white could "marry". I have no idea what day sabbath is.. No one does these days. The 7th Day Adventists say Saturday. Typical churchianity says Sunday. There are some in the Christian Identity crowd that believe it rotates every year. What does it mean to take the lords name in vain? What is an idol? What does it mean by have no other gods before me? Is god's name Yahweh? If so, isn't claiming someone else is God contradicting that commandment? Who is damaged by violating the first four commandments and can the victim come into a court of law to defend the case?
Is there a commandment that says "Thou shalt not rape?" And OBVIOUISLY that is a law written on our hearts, I would assume. Any CRIME that has a victim involved should be obvious to the person committing the act that they are a criminal. If you violate a victimless crime law, are you a law breaker or is the law itself a violator of the law. The law being DO NO HARM. If the law causes harm to the person violating it, and there is no victim stated in the law isn't that law nothing but tyranny? Did Randy Weaver's wife and son die because he violated a law written on his heart or were they murdered because Randy didn't pay $200 for a "tax stamp" when he modified a shotgun below the "legal" length?
The precepts of the Bible can all be summed up in two sentences... LOVE YAHWEH YOUR GOD with ALL YOUR BEING and LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF. The law and the prophets rest on these two greatest commandments.
You’re missing the simple point that man can choose despite knowing the rules, laws or commandments no matter where they are written.
Only Jesus Christ can change hearts and minds.
If you want to bully and mock others then I don’t need to continue with your circular reasoning and logic.
Good bye !!!
Good bye back!
Got a problem...When you place your hand and swear on a "Book"aka "Bible" written by Men !?!?!?!
Get over it. Look at what you can do in the position that you'll be in. Maybe you'll be able to free someone like Matt Hoover who was railroaded because the jury was 12 ignorant people who followed the lying judge's instructions. I don't remember, when I was on a jury having to swear. It was the witnesses who did.
The two greatest guarantees of justice, liberty and peace are the power of a jury to rule on both the facts and the law, and a populace who are on the whole moral and well informed to make up such a jury.
Get rid of the Communist DemocrAt XArty, BLM, IslAm, & the Hitlerite Soros, & his
ugly girlfriend, the hAlfbreed ObAMA, then your desires will come to fruition.
So!
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/fighting-back-know-your-rights