‘Ordinary Citizens’ Don’t Need ‘Weapons Of War’ or ‘High-Capacity’ Magazines,
Yeah About That….
(I just couldn’t resist passing this on to my subscribers. John hits it out of the ballpark with this one! Originally posted at Ammo Land. I frequent there but beware, there are a lot of government brown nose slaves in the comment section. C.L.)
From John Farnum: Democrat politicians are quick to insist that “ordinary citizens” don’t need “weapons of war” nor “high-capacity” magazines. (If we were following the 2nd amendment, especially the first 13 words we sure would! And we wouldn’t need a standing military which the Founding Fathers disliked with a passion. C.L.)
They love cynical sound-bites like, “No one needs ten bullets to kill a deer” (as if we were even talking about sport shooting).
Yet, at the same moment, leftists are mouthing such dishonest platitudes, they themselves are being protected by legions of tax-payer-funded bodyguards, all of whom are carrying “weapons of war” and “high-capacity magazines,” the exact same weapons these sleazy gas-bags simultaneously insist the rest of us don’t “need.”
To rationalize their nauseating hypocrisy, we’re told that modern VCAs [violent criminal actors] are “more sophisticated” and “better armed” than criminals of the past, and therefore, police (and political bodyguards) “need” modern weapons (“of war”), all of which are equipped with “high-capacity magazines.” So that they (police) are adequately equipped to face these dangerous and sophisticated felons.
They curiously make no suggestion with regard to what “ordinary” citizens are supposed to do when facing an identical threat!
Are we to believe that all these “more violent, better-armed criminals,” whom police have to deal with, somehow don’t prey on private citizens, too?
Why is it that politicians apparently “deserve” protection afforded by “weapons of war” and “high-capacity magazines,” but the rest of us don’t?
I think it is fair to assume that VCAs don’t abide by notions of “fairness” and “reasonableness!”
Politicians are right when they tell us that violent crime is on an exponential increase, and their response is to quickly and dramatically increase the level of protection …but only for themselves!
Yet, all this violent mayhem “trickles down” to private citizens, too, doesn’t it? Citizens who don’t enjoy continuous protection from dedicated and heavily armed bodyguards. It is fiction to suggest that any particular neighborhood or person is “special” and that “bad things” happen in other places and to other people.
This is the naive “Shangri-La Fantasy,” and it causes citizens to foolishly believe leftist rhetoric, the false narrative that dangerous trends will never impact “us” directly.
The sage doesn’t believe that rubbish for a moment and arm themselves appropriately!
“In an instant, it became clear to me that all the courage in the world could not withstand this firepower!” ~ A young Charles de Gaulle, in 1914.
About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor, John Farnam will urge you, based on your beliefs, to make up your mind about what you would do when faced with an imminent lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance if any. Defense Training International wants to ensure that its students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or in-actions.
It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to Planet Earth. Mr. Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: Defense Training
It’s not called the “Bill of Needs”.
That's not a Gun sir She identifies as a woman. I mean who else lets you fondle her and Stick your rounds in her as you please?