And none more blind than Second Amendment proponents.
Whereas drug control has been a huge failure, gun control under the impotent Second Amendment has been a huge success.
America was sold down the river when the 18th-century founding fathers replaced Biblical responsibilities (based upon the moral law of God) for Enlightenment rights, and nothing demonstrates it better than the Second Amendment.
Think about it: The Amendment WITH the wording "shall not be infringed" is the MOST infringed, licensed, and limited Amendment of the entire twenty seven. Furthermore, a future generation of our posterity is likely to see the Second Amendment whittled away entirely or repealed altogether. This is inherent nature and danger of optional Enlightenment rights versus non-optional Biblical responsibilities, such as the following:
"Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two-edged sword [or today's equivalent] in their hand ... this honor have all his saints. Praise ye Yah." (Psalm 149:6-9)
"But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house [beginning with spiritual and physical protection], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." (1 Timothy 5:8)
Which is more potent: 1) An optional right, or 2) A non-optional responsibility?
Which is more likely to be infringed, licensed, and ultimately abolished altogether?
Which did the pre-Second Amendment Americans look to for their authority to bear arms, with little or nor infringement?
Ted seems to overlook the reality of the fact that the CONSTITUTION has been replaced by the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO for many years. In his perfect world perfect men would be the leaders. The problem is that they never existed and never will. Think about the story of David and how he was picked by the anointed Samuel to be the King of Israel. And as a man after God's own heart caused the death of a man so he could covet that man's wife. Believing that we can have a government like the Israelites did back in the day of Judges is a pipe dream says fickle me. Otherwise I want to know HOW this is going to ever happen. Outside of the BODY OF CHRIST being empowered to take the Kingdom of Yahweh back from Satan. PS...https://www.courageouslion.us/p/communism-american-style
I had some hope for you Mark after your last response to me on a different article, but now you're back to same old same old rejection of your God and Creator and His dominion commission.
Why? Because Mark can't figure out how it can work, which is a tacit rejection of the one you *claim* is your King!
Today's government-infested Communism (which is what YOU are left with per your rejection of the King of kings dominion commission) is but 1 of 100s of 1000s of consequences of the whirlwind today's America is reaping thanks to the wind sown by the constitutional framers when they (like you) rejected God's triune moral law (His Ten Commandments and their respective statutes and *civil judgments) as government and society's standard:
"[B]ecause they have ... trespassed against my law ... they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind...." (Hosea 8:1, 7)
Today's America is reaping the inevitable ever-intensifying whirlwind resulting from the wind sown by the constitutional framers and fanned by today's hoodwinked Christians and patriots who have been bamboozled into believing today's whirlwind can be dissipated by appealing to the wind responsible for spawning the whirlwind.
There you go, thinking God has any place in Our Dimograzy(TM) again. Don't you know that the entirety of the yankee occupation force and its hordes of midwit mercs are angels?
And the yankee occupation force is the obvious reference to the ruined federalism of your murderous idol, the great white tyrant Lincoln. Finally, the angels I mention are those of J. Madison
Why are you wrongfully assuming that Lincoln is my idol?? Where did anyone infer that? Please articulate. Do you realize that ad hominem is a form of logical fallacy? Are you able to carry a conversation without it and sarcasm? I am genuinely curious as to such.
Our focus should not be the neutering "2A" PRIVILEGE! The fact that they grant it means that they can take it away. It is literally that simple!!
On the other hand, the God-COMMANDED DUTY is much different! It CANNOT be taken away!! Why would a man appeal to an antiChrist government and plead to keep his instrument of defense rather than do as he is commanded by his God to defend himself and his loved ones?!?!?
The focus needs to get off of socially constructed "rights" (AKA PRIVILEGES), grow up and be men, and do as we are commanded. It literally is that simple!! Giving all this attention to nonsense rather than what is truly important (Yahweh and His Word and His COMMANDMENTS -- including the instrument(s) of defense) is just simply folly. We should all be promoting true revival and true repentance and NOT some schoolboy reliance of the overlings to allow us to do what we were born to do and be.....
💯X💯x💯! As a Canadian, Don’t ever, never ever, surrender your weapons!
And there is no such thing as an “illegal gun” in a free society. Any gun is only outlawed to protect the tyrannical government from its citizens.
Illegal --- yes, for sure there are!!! But, UNLAWFUL?? Absolutely NOT! There is a huge difference....
BibleVersusCONstitution.org....
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
NONE SO BLIND AS THE BLIND!
And none more blind than Second Amendment proponents.
Whereas drug control has been a huge failure, gun control under the impotent Second Amendment has been a huge success.
America was sold down the river when the 18th-century founding fathers replaced Biblical responsibilities (based upon the moral law of God) for Enlightenment rights, and nothing demonstrates it better than the Second Amendment.
Think about it: The Amendment WITH the wording "shall not be infringed" is the MOST infringed, licensed, and limited Amendment of the entire twenty seven. Furthermore, a future generation of our posterity is likely to see the Second Amendment whittled away entirely or repealed altogether. This is inherent nature and danger of optional Enlightenment rights versus non-optional Biblical responsibilities, such as the following:
"Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a two-edged sword [or today's equivalent] in their hand ... this honor have all his saints. Praise ye Yah." (Psalm 149:6-9)
"But if any provide not for his own, and especially for those of his own house [beginning with spiritual and physical protection], he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." (1 Timothy 5:8)
Which is more potent: 1) An optional right, or 2) A non-optional responsibility?
Which is more likely to be infringed, licensed, and ultimately abolished altogether?
Which did the pre-Second Amendment Americans look to for their authority to bear arms, with little or nor infringement?
For more, listen to "The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight," delivered at the Springfield, Missouri Firearms and Freedom Symposium, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/#FeaturedMessages
See also online Chapter 12 "Amendment 2: Constitutional vs. Biblical Self-Defense" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt12.html
Ted seems to overlook the reality of the fact that the CONSTITUTION has been replaced by the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO for many years. In his perfect world perfect men would be the leaders. The problem is that they never existed and never will. Think about the story of David and how he was picked by the anointed Samuel to be the King of Israel. And as a man after God's own heart caused the death of a man so he could covet that man's wife. Believing that we can have a government like the Israelites did back in the day of Judges is a pipe dream says fickle me. Otherwise I want to know HOW this is going to ever happen. Outside of the BODY OF CHRIST being empowered to take the Kingdom of Yahweh back from Satan. PS...https://www.courageouslion.us/p/communism-american-style
I had some hope for you Mark after your last response to me on a different article, but now you're back to same old same old rejection of your God and Creator and His dominion commission.
Why? Because Mark can't figure out how it can work, which is a tacit rejection of the one you *claim* is your King!
See blog article "Self-Imposed Impotence" at https://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/self-imposed-impotence/
Then "10 Reasons Why the Kingdom Here on Earth Isn't Mission Impossible" at https://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/10-reasons-the-kingdom-here-on-earth-isnt-mission-impossible/
Today's government-infested Communism (which is what YOU are left with per your rejection of the King of kings dominion commission) is but 1 of 100s of 1000s of consequences of the whirlwind today's America is reaping thanks to the wind sown by the constitutional framers when they (like you) rejected God's triune moral law (His Ten Commandments and their respective statutes and *civil judgments) as government and society's standard:
"[B]ecause they have ... trespassed against my law ... they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind...." (Hosea 8:1, 7)
Today's America is reaping the inevitable ever-intensifying whirlwind resulting from the wind sown by the constitutional framers and fanned by today's hoodwinked Christians and patriots who have been bamboozled into believing today's whirlwind can be dissipated by appealing to the wind responsible for spawning the whirlwind.
AMEN, Brother!!!!!
There you go, thinking God has any place in Our Dimograzy(TM) again. Don't you know that the entirety of the yankee occupation force and its hordes of midwit mercs are angels?
What is it that you think you are talking about?
Chill, Mssr Pomposity. That’
sarcastic ridicule of the feds. Particularly of “the constitution”.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/169099-but-whether-the-constitution-really-be-one-thing-or-another
Of Democracy
https://store.mises.org/Democracy-The-God-That-Failed-P240.aspx
And the yankee occupation force is the obvious reference to the ruined federalism of your murderous idol, the great white tyrant Lincoln. Finally, the angels I mention are those of J. Madison
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7196640-if-men-were-angels-no-government-would-be-necessary-if
Got it now, you dim witted bombast?
Why are you wrongfully assuming that Lincoln is my idol?? Where did anyone infer that? Please articulate. Do you realize that ad hominem is a form of logical fallacy? Are you able to carry a conversation without it and sarcasm? I am genuinely curious as to such.
What were you trying to say? Anything?
Our focus should not be the neutering "2A" PRIVILEGE! The fact that they grant it means that they can take it away. It is literally that simple!!
On the other hand, the God-COMMANDED DUTY is much different! It CANNOT be taken away!! Why would a man appeal to an antiChrist government and plead to keep his instrument of defense rather than do as he is commanded by his God to defend himself and his loved ones?!?!?
The focus needs to get off of socially constructed "rights" (AKA PRIVILEGES), grow up and be men, and do as we are commanded. It literally is that simple!! Giving all this attention to nonsense rather than what is truly important (Yahweh and His Word and His COMMANDMENTS -- including the instrument(s) of defense) is just simply folly. We should all be promoting true revival and true repentance and NOT some schoolboy reliance of the overlings to allow us to do what we were born to do and be.....
BibleVersuCONstitution.org......
Preach!