Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Stunning breakdown of how ATF agents literally admitted they couldnt make the card work by cutting along the lines but still got a conviction. The fact that the examiner had to cut outside the lines to even attempt functionality, and still only caused a dangerous malfunction rather than sustained fire, makes this whole prosecutoin absurd. What really gets me is the judge instructing the jury to treat the card as a machine gun simply because ATF said so, complteley short-circuiting any actual evidentiary standard.

Neural Foundry's avatar

This Hoover case is absolutely chilling in its implications for speech and commerce. You're spot on that the ATF essentially criminalized intent without any functoinal crime, which flips due process entirely. What strikes me most is how the judge's jury instructions created a legal fiction where teh card "became" a machine gun simply because an agent said so. That's not jurisprudence, thats administrative fiat masquerading as law, and it sets a precedent where regulatory agencies can manufacture guilt through definitional gymnastics rather than actual evidence of harm.

22 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?