I hear you from across the pond. You might be hearing steel sharpening I am hearing nothing. grumbling and mumbling but not a cohesive thought or a bit of back bone - it just all seems too big, too far gone and people too demoralised by the brainwashing. BTW I know it's not relevant but I am noticing on every, I do mean every substack, article and recent print books that I read these days pretty obvious spelling mistakes, is it because AI is used? anyone know. In this we had privilage/Privilege and sheer/shear/s.
If you see spelling mistakes on my post, typically it’s my fault for not going back and looking for typos or dumb mistakes like there instead of their. AI does a pretty good job of spelling.
Which of God’s laws are you referring to that were rejected? Obviously not all of them since many are encoded into criminal law. Like murder, stealing, etc. As for keeping the Sabbath day holy? Which day is that? Some say Saturday, Some say Sunday, some say it rotates according to the Hebrew calendar. What MAN is going to decided and what would give him the authority to do so? What does it mean to not take the “Lords” name invain? What is His/Her whatever’s name and what does it mean to not take it invain? Who will determine? I think that it is obvious that we have made other men our God’s by placing them into positions of POWER where they can be the wicked, vile, psychopathic creatures they are with impunity. You tube is FULL Of police acting like tyrannical assholes. That in itself would create a response from Yahweh that would most likely be unfavorable to most.
Your words are like a song to my heart. From your lips to the creators ears, worldwide, the "slaves" are about to lose it. As this global governance scenario comes more clearly into view (like the SmartLA28 summer Olympics trial run of U.N. Agenda 2030 C40 cities), the Great re-Awakening is happening and could counter-balance the "dark enlightenment" of The Great Reset. Literally, it's all energy. In Tipping Point, Gladwell wrote about a critical mass of collective energy effecting the homeostatic mechanism of the status quo. So my hope lies with the 15% possible critical thinkers who, if practicing daily consciousness raising (to sustain higher frequencies like on the consciousness scale of David R. Hawkins), could destabilize a smooth roll-out of the psychopathic, dystopian agenda.
Define "Founding Fathers." Many of those around for the Revolution, especially those who helped inspire it philosophically, vehemently opposed the consolidation of the sovereign nations under the new form of government marketed as a "republic."
We have now exactly what those true Americans knew would evolve under the Constitution. What perhaps they did not account for was the abject ignorance and failure to defend liberty that defines today's "American."
Amen. And "amen" to the rest of your comments as well. Finally, someone understands reality.
As for "republic" in quotations, you are spot on. A republic is literally a thing of the people but "the" people never had a thing to do with the founding of the country. It was founded by "The People," (mucky mucks), a bunch of slave owners, traffickers and breeders, opium traffickers, pirates, war profiteers, land and currency speculators, and who knows what else. Furthermore, as you point out, the "antifederalists" knew and predicted it all.
Great comment there. One of the best I've ever read.
I define them as the 59 signers of the Declaration and the 39 signers of the Constitution. What we have “evolved” into isn’t anything ANY of them could fore see. WE ARE A COMMUNIST COUNTRY. You can in now way convince me that was their intention. https://www.courageouslion.us/p/communism-american-style
"What we have “evolved” into isn’t anything ANY of them could fore see."
While I agree that we are a Commie country, you'll need to define that as well.
The antifederalists essentially predicted and feared that it would become an empire run by the so-called aristocrats and that's what happened no matter what it's called. In fact, Comminizm is a big boy project and the mugwump scum at the top get all the bennies while we, the people who don't matter, pay for it all.
"Communism" was supposedly created to benefit the masses and we all know how that turned out in practice. That should surprise nobody since the movement was conceived and funded by the usual criminal types.
STL's comment is airtight and bullet proof and the fact that people refuse to understand the message accounts for a large part for the mess we're in today.
I think my post well defines what I consider a communist country. If all 10 planks are in force and effect, well..we sure aren't a Constitutional republic.
It's clear to me that it was always intended to be a constitutional republic in name only.
And I have been pointing out the fact that Marx's 10 planks of the Commie manifesto have been implemented here, in the land of the (don't make me laugh) free, for several decades now.
It could be argued that the Anti-Federalists' primary concern was the consolidation of power under a national (central?) government.
Men like Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, Luther Martin, George Mason, et al. because they did foresee where this concentration of power could lead. They'd just overthrown a government for this reason and others!
The new "republic" restored that which had been overthrown, but enjoyed better PR. The Federalists violated the very rules established under the Articles requiring unanimous support by all 13 nations for any changes.
I think the replacement of the confederation by a republic under a national government betrayed the philosophy and spirit of the Declaration.
The constitution was in fact, a coup d' etat, a de facto negation of the so called "revolution's" advertised causes. The "rev" was co-opted, and as one of the premier historians and philosophers of the day, Mercy Otis Warren, wrote ~1798, "Sic Transit Gloria Americana" (Thus passes the glory of America) meaning the new constitution represented the end of the supposed values fought for.
For example Shays rebellion, suppressed by a private militia, (ala the tactics of the criminally brutal British East India Company) proves her correct.
"The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
"It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
Well, for one thing…it’s isn’t worth a crap because they ignore every provision of it that they feel like and have slowly turned us into a communist country that the average person doesn’t see.
So it's working just as intended and as predicted by the honest ones in the bunch.
They call it Comminzm, Fascism, private-public partnership, whatever seems to soothe the masses but it's all just government which is a protection racket and a Ponzi scheme all rolled into one sewer that feeds the most criminal usurpers.
I hear you from across the pond. You might be hearing steel sharpening I am hearing nothing. grumbling and mumbling but not a cohesive thought or a bit of back bone - it just all seems too big, too far gone and people too demoralised by the brainwashing. BTW I know it's not relevant but I am noticing on every, I do mean every substack, article and recent print books that I read these days pretty obvious spelling mistakes, is it because AI is used? anyone know. In this we had privilage/Privilege and sheer/shear/s.
If you see spelling mistakes on my post, typically it’s my fault for not going back and looking for typos or dumb mistakes like there instead of their. AI does a pretty good job of spelling.
Man's government, with all that accompanies it, is what we got when we rejected God's laws.
Which of God’s laws are you referring to that were rejected? Obviously not all of them since many are encoded into criminal law. Like murder, stealing, etc. As for keeping the Sabbath day holy? Which day is that? Some say Saturday, Some say Sunday, some say it rotates according to the Hebrew calendar. What MAN is going to decided and what would give him the authority to do so? What does it mean to not take the “Lords” name invain? What is His/Her whatever’s name and what does it mean to not take it invain? Who will determine? I think that it is obvious that we have made other men our God’s by placing them into positions of POWER where they can be the wicked, vile, psychopathic creatures they are with impunity. You tube is FULL Of police acting like tyrannical assholes. That in itself would create a response from Yahweh that would most likely be unfavorable to most.
Where have you been Brother? I haven’t seen a post from you in a long minute.
I’ve been busy trying to wake up my neighbors on “What’s Happening In Harrison, No Censorship” page on Fakebook.
Your words are like a song to my heart. From your lips to the creators ears, worldwide, the "slaves" are about to lose it. As this global governance scenario comes more clearly into view (like the SmartLA28 summer Olympics trial run of U.N. Agenda 2030 C40 cities), the Great re-Awakening is happening and could counter-balance the "dark enlightenment" of The Great Reset. Literally, it's all energy. In Tipping Point, Gladwell wrote about a critical mass of collective energy effecting the homeostatic mechanism of the status quo. So my hope lies with the 15% possible critical thinkers who, if practicing daily consciousness raising (to sustain higher frequencies like on the consciousness scale of David R. Hawkins), could destabilize a smooth roll-out of the psychopathic, dystopian agenda.
Define "Founding Fathers." Many of those around for the Revolution, especially those who helped inspire it philosophically, vehemently opposed the consolidation of the sovereign nations under the new form of government marketed as a "republic."
We have now exactly what those true Americans knew would evolve under the Constitution. What perhaps they did not account for was the abject ignorance and failure to defend liberty that defines today's "American."
"Define "Founding Fathers."
Amen. And "amen" to the rest of your comments as well. Finally, someone understands reality.
As for "republic" in quotations, you are spot on. A republic is literally a thing of the people but "the" people never had a thing to do with the founding of the country. It was founded by "The People," (mucky mucks), a bunch of slave owners, traffickers and breeders, opium traffickers, pirates, war profiteers, land and currency speculators, and who knows what else. Furthermore, as you point out, the "antifederalists" knew and predicted it all.
Great comment there. One of the best I've ever read.
I define them as the 59 signers of the Declaration and the 39 signers of the Constitution. What we have “evolved” into isn’t anything ANY of them could fore see. WE ARE A COMMUNIST COUNTRY. You can in now way convince me that was their intention. https://www.courageouslion.us/p/communism-american-style
"What we have “evolved” into isn’t anything ANY of them could fore see."
While I agree that we are a Commie country, you'll need to define that as well.
The antifederalists essentially predicted and feared that it would become an empire run by the so-called aristocrats and that's what happened no matter what it's called. In fact, Comminizm is a big boy project and the mugwump scum at the top get all the bennies while we, the people who don't matter, pay for it all.
"Communism" was supposedly created to benefit the masses and we all know how that turned out in practice. That should surprise nobody since the movement was conceived and funded by the usual criminal types.
STL's comment is airtight and bullet proof and the fact that people refuse to understand the message accounts for a large part for the mess we're in today.
I think my post well defines what I consider a communist country. If all 10 planks are in force and effect, well..we sure aren't a Constitutional republic.
It's clear to me that it was always intended to be a constitutional republic in name only.
And I have been pointing out the fact that Marx's 10 planks of the Commie manifesto have been implemented here, in the land of the (don't make me laugh) free, for several decades now.
Thank you, sir. ❤️
I am happy to support ideas that comport with reality, so the thanks is to you as well, ma'am!
It could be argued that the Anti-Federalists' primary concern was the consolidation of power under a national (central?) government.
Men like Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, Luther Martin, George Mason, et al. because they did foresee where this concentration of power could lead. They'd just overthrown a government for this reason and others!
The new "republic" restored that which had been overthrown, but enjoyed better PR. The Federalists violated the very rules established under the Articles requiring unanimous support by all 13 nations for any changes.
I think the replacement of the confederation by a republic under a national government betrayed the philosophy and spirit of the Declaration.
Again, you nailed it.
The constitution was in fact, a coup d' etat, a de facto negation of the so called "revolution's" advertised causes. The "rev" was co-opted, and as one of the premier historians and philosophers of the day, Mercy Otis Warren, wrote ~1798, "Sic Transit Gloria Americana" (Thus passes the glory of America) meaning the new constitution represented the end of the supposed values fought for.
For example Shays rebellion, suppressed by a private militia, (ala the tactics of the criminally brutal British East India Company) proves her correct.
"The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d'état.
"It had been drafted, in the first place, by men representing special economic interests. Four-fifths of them were public creditors, one-third were land speculators, and one-fifth represented interests in shipping, manufacturing, and merchandising. Most of them were lawyers. Not one of them represented the interest of production — Vilescit origine tali. (the dice were loaded from the start)
Albert Jay Nock, Liberty vs. the Constitution: The Early Struggle
Well, for one thing…it’s isn’t worth a crap because they ignore every provision of it that they feel like and have slowly turned us into a communist country that the average person doesn’t see.
So it's working just as intended and as predicted by the honest ones in the bunch.
They call it Comminzm, Fascism, private-public partnership, whatever seems to soothe the masses but it's all just government which is a protection racket and a Ponzi scheme all rolled into one sewer that feeds the most criminal usurpers.
Bastille in the United States, is the effn CONGRESS and the SENATE, and the entire Communist/-
Democrat Party, not the current president and his administration.
What say thee, America?
The DSA are being snitch-jacketed by the Fascists. That PsyOp seems to be going very well.