24 Comments

The government policy is "All money belongs to the government." They have the right take any time, for any reason.

Expand full comment

""All money belongs to the government."' Is totally insane because "the government" is made up of one thing...PSYCHOPATHIC CONTROL FREAK PARASITES. So who are they to claim that statement? The can KMA and eat lead.

Expand full comment

Exactly my friend.

Expand full comment

It's what the IRS has been doing since early in the 20th century, and from what I have seen doing it unconstitutionally and illegally - as there are many people trying to expose the fact it never passed Congress.

Expand full comment

Yes. The IRS has taken our money and our rights.

Most people don't even pay taxes. The withholding tax means that government seizes the money before you even get it, takes what they want, and let you have what's left. It’s supposed to be our money, not theirs. They have no right to do this.

Expand full comment

This is one of your most important articles as most people are unaware of the depths to civil asset forfeiture. Police departments use it to fund their war chest, contributing to those entities becoming warlords with sophisticated military weaponry. Seizure of drugs is interesting as it isn't destroyed, but sometimes enters the market through corruption. It's another example of what a joke "home of the free" really is.

Expand full comment

and imagine…that was written in 1997!

Expand full comment

This is theft, plain and simple, and it does violate the Constitution.

Expand full comment

It shit cans the 5th amendment.

Expand full comment

Nice work, CL! Steve Bannon said at the Turning Point conference that Trump will "end the Fed" if he gets re-elected. I wondered, how is he going to get Wall Street bankers to agree to end unlimited money printing? There had to be a catch. Catherine Austin Fitts said in an interview I watched today that for all the issues we have with the Fed and debt based money, it is at least (theoretically) accountable to the citizens of the United States. We'd go through them to get back what was stolen from us via taxation, sending our $$$ overseas for endless wars, etc. She said something that relates to your article, which is that if the Fed goes away we become slaves of international monetary organizations like the BIS, the central bank of central banks and that paper money is a distraction where the real prize is our tangible assets! After reading your post I feel that the interview with CAF was misleading. Granted, it would be even more difficult to fight lawyers in Switzerland to get your car or your life savings back but she could've mentioned how we basically already have no asset protection regardless of what the Fed is or what would replace it. How do these traitor judges live with themselves knowing they destroyed their country?! *sigh*

Expand full comment

What's interesting about the forfeiture laws, is that quite apart from violating constitutional rights and the concept of property rights, is that this is mentioned (I think, but might be wrong about this), as part of the plans written in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion - which was first translated as early as 1896 by a Russian woman living in France who was given a copy, and she was thwarted in her efforts to bring it to the attention of the Czar, but several years later it was published by a Russian Orthodox priest - who as soon as the Bolshevik communists took over imprisoned him, tortured him, and let him die in jail, and they also burned all copies of his translation of the protocols, and anyone found with a copy could be shot on sight. Most of the Bolsheviks were Zionist Jews. Zionism is communism, and communism is Zionism.

Expand full comment

Which protocol do you refer to specifically? I think some of your information may be in error when it comes to the woman translator, but that’s not really relevant to my question.

Expand full comment

I thought the point was made about forfeiture laws in the Protocols, but I could well be mistaken, I'll have to read them again, I added an amendment to that comment- it is however mentioned in Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars - Quote:

"When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment."

Regarding the woman mentioned in relation to the Protocols, while I have read that a woman of high social status was responsible for obtaining the document it was only recently that I found this quote that identified her - it comes from the 2010 edition of Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great:

"The Protocols came to light through a series of events that began in 1884, when the daughter of a Russian general, Madamoiselle Justine Glinka, was endeavoring to serve her country in Paris by obtaining political information. She communicated her plans to General Orgevskii in St. Petersburg. For this purpose she employed a Jew, Joseph Schorst, member of the Mizraim Lodge (Oriental Rite of Freemasonry) in Paris. Schorst offered to obtain for her a document of great importance to Russia for the price of 2,500 francs. Mlle. Glinka received the money from St. Petersburg and obtained the document, which turned out to be the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Expand full comment

"Zionism a worldwide Jewish movement for the establishment and development of the state of Israel." Random House Webster's College Dictionary 1991. Doesn't state anything about a relationship with communism. Guess that part came from your racist brain.

Expand full comment

Firstly, since the online dictionaries decided to take a 200 year old definition of 'vaccination' and redefine it to follow the pseudoscience of the CDC for promoting Covid-poisons called 'vaccines' I don't know why you'd bother to quote these dictionaries.

Secondly Zionism was never a "Jewish movement" - there was MASSIVE RESISTANCE by the Jewish community around the world against the Zionist movement for multiple reasons - firstly the religious rabbis that followed the teachings in the Torah said that it violated the instructions of god that had told the Jewish people not to seek to return to Zion until the Messiah returned to earth.

Zionism was a POLITICAL for the establishment of an etho-nation state based on people who identify as Jewish. Zionism was established to create the state of Israel. The original Zionists were all SECULAR JEWS. As are the majority today. But for every Jewish Zionist there are probably another ten that are Christians - because Christian Zionists outnumber Jewish Zionists. And what they both share in common is the belief that reforming Israel, and rebuilding the Jewish temple - which means tearing down the Arabs mosque that sits on the site today - will help bring back the Messiah!

Zionism and communism share many characteristics in common - particularly when you examine the history of who funded the movements - you find the same international bankers! The true communists are the central bankers because they own the Money Monopoly that extracts and transfers the wealth of everyone who uses Central Bankers Cash, and everyone who uses the credit system, and whoever pays taxes - because the first priority of taxation is to pay the bankers who are lending the money to our governments!!!! We are all slaves to the bankers. And that is a nutshell is communism - they control the means of production through control of central banks and money. Vladimir Lenin published a great book on it in 1916 called Imperialism, the Last Stage of Capitalism - I don't believe he wrote the book because it was an outline of how to use the banking and central banking system to seize control of all the wealth in a nation - and that's what the communist do! It's the same system the western citizens live under. Just with a different face - the evil is more exposed.

Last point - there isn't a racist cell in my body, let alone my brain, but I sure as hell hate racists, especially closet racists and those attacking mankind. in multiple ways while claiming they are there to help.

Cheers.

Expand full comment

In 1991, the internet was still in its infancy and I believe, most of us still followed rules. Changing definitions, genders, ideologies, science, etc., is more of the 'new, recent way of being.' Having 'said' that, most of the rest of your comment was educational - thank you for your time and effort.

Expand full comment

Hi Janet - thanks for that. Glad you found it useful. And I can't see your original comment that inspired me to write back to you. Never mind. I can take a swipe at me without getting upset about it. We live in difficult times, and there's a lot of emotion flying around. I try to stay calm and deal with criticism in a constructive way. Cheers.

Expand full comment

So Janet, do you rely no the definitions for everything in life from a dictionary? If that is ALL Zionism is, then maybe you can explain why there are NINETEEN ANTI ZIONIST organizations in the world that are all JEWISH? Why, if ALL that Zionism is, is the establishment of the state of Israel, is there that many JEWS against it?? Please, let us know. We are interested. And asking questions shouldn't cause a "you're racist" response.

Expand full comment

Here's the proof that the government is the enemy of the people - how the few are grabbing control over the many. If you've ever have needed more proof, this is it by turning America from law-abiding citizens, into mere wallets open to their never-ending bottomless greed and corruption. They ALL need to go!!!! and, the sooner - the better; the quicker - the better. Keep America great instead of pitiful losers. Take America Back!

Expand full comment

If we can just get a governor somewhere to realize the power behind the first 13 words of the 2nd amendment. Referred to in modern times as an individual’s right to carry and use arms for self-defense, the Second Amendment was envisioned by the framers of the Constitution, according to College of William and Mary law professor and future U.S. District Court judge St. George Tucker in 1803 in his great work Blackstone’s Commentaries:

With Notes of Reference to the Constitution and Laws of the Federal Government of the United States and of the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the “true palladium of liberty.” In addition to checking federal power, the Second Amendment also provided state governments with what Luther Martin (1744/48–1826) described as the “last coup de grace” that would enable the states “to thwart and oppose the general government.” Last, it enshrined the ancient Florentine and Roman constitutional principle of civil and military virtue by making every citizen a soldier and every soldier a citizen.

https://www.courageouslion.us/p/those-forgotten-and-ignored-13-words

Expand full comment

Patriots are not revolutionaries trying to overthrow the government of the United States. Patriots are Counter-Revolutionaries trying to prevent the government from overthrowing the Constitution.

Expand full comment

You are 100% absolutely correct.

Expand full comment